International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
Fidelity of implementation to a care team redesign and improved outcomes of diabetes care.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grace Sherry M, Rich Jeremy, Chin William, Rodriguez Hector P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We assessed fidelity of implementation (FOI) to the intended features of a primary care team redesign that integrated registered nurse care managers and patient health coaches onto existing care teams. The relation of FOI ranking and improvements in intermediate outcomes of diabetes care was examined.
DESIGN: We assessed FOI by interviewing frontline primary care team members (n = 20). We explored the relation of FOI and outcomes of diabetes care (n = 10 206 patients) over a 3-year period (2010-12). Multilevel, multivariate regression estimated the relation of FOI and improvements in outcomes of diabetes care.
SETTING: Five primary care practices in greater Los Angeles, CA, USA.
PARTICIPANTS: Ten thousand, two hundred and six adult patients with diabetes; 20 frontline primary care clinicians and staff.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control among adult diabetic patients.
RESULTS: All practices improved diabetic patients' LDL-C control over time. In adjusted analyses, the practice with the highest FOI achieved the largest improvement in blood pressure and HbA1c control among diabetic patients. In contrast, the practice with the lowest FOI had the least improvements in blood pressure, HbA1c and LDL-C control. FOI was an inconsistent predictor of intermediate outcomes of diabetes care for other practices.
CONCLUSIONS: FOI assessment can be useful for identifying low FOI to a redesign so that technical assistance and resources can be provided to improve team functioning and patient outcomes. High FOI can enable greater improvements in patient outcomes in the context of primary care practice redesign.
DESIGN: We assessed FOI by interviewing frontline primary care team members (n = 20). We explored the relation of FOI and outcomes of diabetes care (n = 10 206 patients) over a 3-year period (2010-12). Multilevel, multivariate regression estimated the relation of FOI and improvements in outcomes of diabetes care.
SETTING: Five primary care practices in greater Los Angeles, CA, USA.
PARTICIPANTS: Ten thousand, two hundred and six adult patients with diabetes; 20 frontline primary care clinicians and staff.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control among adult diabetic patients.
RESULTS: All practices improved diabetic patients' LDL-C control over time. In adjusted analyses, the practice with the highest FOI achieved the largest improvement in blood pressure and HbA1c control among diabetic patients. In contrast, the practice with the lowest FOI had the least improvements in blood pressure, HbA1c and LDL-C control. FOI was an inconsistent predictor of intermediate outcomes of diabetes care for other practices.
CONCLUSIONS: FOI assessment can be useful for identifying low FOI to a redesign so that technical assistance and resources can be provided to improve team functioning and patient outcomes. High FOI can enable greater improvements in patient outcomes in the context of primary care practice redesign.