The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica · 2002
Management of appendiceal masses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tingstedt Bobby, Bexe-Lindskog Elinor, Ekelund Mats, Andersson Roland
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients treated for appendiceal abscess, and managed either conservatively or surgically, and to describe the short and long-term outcome as well as incidence of interval appendicectomy in those treated conservatively.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Sweden.
PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess, 50 treated conservatively and 43 who were operated on, with a mean age of 46 (14-93) years. Mean (range) follow-up for patients operated on was 65 (11-135) and for those treated conservatively 66 (6-136) months.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Course of acute disease, recorded complications, recurrence of appendicitis and incidence of interval appendicectomy during follow-up.
RESULTS: The duration of pain before admission was 4 (0.5-82) days for those operated on and 7 (2-60) days for those treated conservatively. A palpable mass was more common in the conservatively managed group. Complications were common among patients who were operated on. No interval appendicectomies were done during the second half of the study period. 4 of the patients treated conservatively (8%) had an underlying tumour diagnosed at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative management of patients with appendiceal masses seems to be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and the risk of a more extensive surgical procedure. If possible, a conservative approach should be advocated. Because of inaccurate radiological imaging during the acute phase and the risk of an underlying malignancy, routine follow-up is necessary. Routine interval appendicectomy cannot be recommended.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Sweden.
PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess, 50 treated conservatively and 43 who were operated on, with a mean age of 46 (14-93) years. Mean (range) follow-up for patients operated on was 65 (11-135) and for those treated conservatively 66 (6-136) months.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Course of acute disease, recorded complications, recurrence of appendicitis and incidence of interval appendicectomy during follow-up.
RESULTS: The duration of pain before admission was 4 (0.5-82) days for those operated on and 7 (2-60) days for those treated conservatively. A palpable mass was more common in the conservatively managed group. Complications were common among patients who were operated on. No interval appendicectomies were done during the second half of the study period. 4 of the patients treated conservatively (8%) had an underlying tumour diagnosed at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative management of patients with appendiceal masses seems to be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and the risk of a more extensive surgical procedure. If possible, a conservative approach should be advocated. Because of inaccurate radiological imaging during the acute phase and the risk of an underlying malignancy, routine follow-up is necessary. Routine interval appendicectomy cannot be recommended.