MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circresaha.116.309602

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation research · 2016

The High Blood Pressure-Malaria Protection Hypothesis.

Gallego-Delgado Julio, Walther Thomas, Rodriguez Ana

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: A recently proposed hypothesis states that malaria may contribute to hypertension in endemic areas,1 but the role of angiotensin II (Ang II), a major regulator of blood pressure, was not considered. Elevated levels of Ang II may confer protection against malaria morbidity and mortality, providing an alternative explanation for hypertension in malaria endemic areas.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss a possible alternative cause for hypertension in populations who have been under the selective pressure of malaria.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

We reviewed published scientific literature for studies that could establish a link between Ang II and malaria. Both genetic and functional studies suggested that high levels of Ang II may confer protection against cerebral malaria by strengthening the integrity of the endothelial brain barrier. We also describe strong experimental evidence supporting our hypothesis through genetic, functional, and interventional studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A causal association between high levels of Ang II and protection from malaria pathogenesis can provide a likely explanation for the increased prevalence in hypertension observed in populations of African and South Asian origin. Furthermore, this potential causative connection might also direct unique approaches for the effective treatment of cerebral malaria.

Для цитирования: Gallego-Delgado Julio, Walther Thomas, Rodriguez Ana. The High Blood Pressure-Malaria Protection Hypothesis.. Circulation research. 2016. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.116.309602.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.