MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017885

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation · 2016

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation for Risk Stratification in the Brugada Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis.

Sroubek Jakub, Probst Vincent, Mazzanti Andrea, Delise Pietro, Hevia Jesus Castro, Ohkubo Kimie, Zorzi Alessandro, Champagne Jean, Kostopoulou Anna, Yin Xiaoyan, Napolitano Carlo, Milan David J, Wilde Arthur, Sacher Frederic, Borggrefe Martin, Ellinor Patrick T, Theodorakis George, Nault Isabelle, Corrado Domenico, Watanabe Ichiro, Antzelevitch Charles, Allocca Giuseppe, Priori Silvia G, Lubitz Steven A

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The role of programmed ventricular stimulation in identifying patients with Brugada syndrome at the highest risk for sudden death is uncertain.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of prospective, observational studies of patients with Brugada syndrome without a history of sudden cardiac arrest who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. We estimated incidence rates and relative hazards of cardiac arrest or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock. We analyzed individual-level data from 8 studies comprising 1312 patients who experienced 65 cardiac events (median follow-up, 38.3 months). A total of 527 patients were induced into arrhythmias with up to triple extrastimuli. Induction was associated with cardiac events during follow-up (hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-4.92, P<0.001), with the greatest risk observed among those induced with single or double extrastimuli. Annual event rates varied substantially by syncope history, presence of spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern, and arrhythmia induction. The lowest risk occurred in individuals without syncope and with drug-induced type 1 patterns (0.23%, 95% CI, 0.05-0.68 for no induced arrhythmia with up to double extrastimuli; 0.45%, 95% CI, 0.01-2.49 for induced arrhythmia), and the highest risk occurred in individuals with syncope and spontaneous type 1 patterns (2.55%, 95% CI, 1.58-3.89 for no induced arrhythmia; 5.60%, 95% CI, 2.98-9.58 for induced arrhythmia).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Brugada syndrome, arrhythmias induced with programmed ventricular stimulation are associated with future ventricular arrhythmia risk. Induction with fewer extrastimuli is associated with higher risk. However, clinical risk factors are important determinants of arrhythmia risk, and lack of induction does not necessarily portend low ventricular arrhythmia risk, particularly in patients with high-risk clinical features.

Для цитирования: Sroubek Jakub, Probst Vincent, Mazzanti Andrea, Delise Pietro, Hevia Jesus Castro, Ohkubo Kimie, Zorzi Alessandro, Champagne Jean, Kostopoulou Anna, Yin Xiaoyan, Napolitano Carlo, Milan David J, Wilde Arthur, Sacher Frederic, Borggrefe Martin, Ellinor Patrick T, Theodorakis George, Nault Isabelle, Corrado Domenico, Watanabe Ichiro, Antzelevitch Charles, Allocca Giuseppe, Priori Silvia G, Lubitz Steven A. Programmed Ventricular Stimulation for Risk Stratification in the Brugada Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis.. Circulation. 2016. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017885.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.