MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21873/invivo.11220

Медицинская библиотека · In vivo (Athens, Greece) · 2018

Clinical and Prognostic Analysis of Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Synchronous and Metachronous Multiple Malignancies.

Yamamoto Keisuke, Takano Kenichi, Kondo Atsushi, Kurose Makoto, Obata Kazufumi, Himi Tetsuo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: To analyze the clinical features and prevalence of synchronous and metachronous second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC), their associated risk factors, and cause-specific mortality.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients treated with curative intent at our hospital. Statistical analyses were performed to determine factors predictive of SPM and cause-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Sixty-three of 136 patients (46.3%) developed SPM; of these, 41 (30.1%) and 42 (30.9%) had synchronous and metachronous SPMs, respectively, with patient overlap. The most common site of synchronous and metachronous SPMs was the oesophagus (65.8% and 24.4%, respectively); the corresponding overall survival rates were 34.1% and 66.5%, respectively. Furthermore, heavy drinking was significantly correlated with synchronous SPM (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Oesophageal cancer surveillance is recommended for patients with HSCC, especially heavy drinkers. Our findings may help identify and properly manage HSCC patients at high risk of SPMs.

Для цитирования: Yamamoto Keisuke, Takano Kenichi, Kondo Atsushi, Kurose Makoto, Obata Kazufumi, Himi Tetsuo. Clinical and Prognostic Analysis of Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Synchronous and Metachronous Multiple Malignancies.. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2018. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11220.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.