MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.26344

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2015

First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial.

Grundeken Maik J, Wykrzykowska Joanna J, Ishibashi Yuki, Garg Scot, de Vries Ton, Garcia-Garcia Hector M, Onuma Yoshinobu, de Winter Robbert J, Buszman Pawel, Linke Axel, Ischinger Thomas, Klauss Volker, Eberli Franz, Corti Roberto, Wijns William, Morice Marie-Claude, di Mario Carlo, Meier Bernhard, Jüni Peter, Yazdani Ashkan, Copt Samuel, Windecker Stephan, Serruys Patrick W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Historically, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions was associated with worse procedural and clinical outcomes when compared with PCI of non-bifurcation lesions. Newer generation drug-eluting stents (DES) might improve long-term clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The LEADERS trial was a 10-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority, all-comers trial, randomizing 1,707 patients to treatment with a biolimus A9(TM) -eluting stent (BES) with an abluminal biodegradable polymer or a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with a durable polymer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00389220). Five-year clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without bifurcation lesions and between BES and SES in the bifurcation lesion subgroup. There were 497 (29%) patients with at least 1 bifurcation lesion (BES = 258; SES = 239). At 5-year follow-up, the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically-indicated (CI) target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed more frequently in the bifurcation group (26.6% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.049). Within the bifurcation lesion subgroup, no differences were observed in (cardiac) death or MI rates between BES and SES. However, CI target lesion revascularization (TLR) (10.1% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.0495), and CI TVR (12.0% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.023) rates were significantly lower in the BES group. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) rate was numerically lower in the BES group (3.1% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.15). Very late (>1 year) definite/probable ST rates trended to be lower with BES (0.4% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of bifurcation lesions, use of BES led to superior long-term efficacy compared with SES. Safety outcomes were comparable between BES and SES, with an observed trend toward a lower rate of very late definite/probable ST between 1 and 5 years with the BES. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Для цитирования: Grundeken Maik J, Wykrzykowska Joanna J, Ishibashi Yuki, Garg Scot, de Vries Ton, Garcia-Garcia Hector M, Onuma Yoshinobu, de Winter Robbert J, Buszman Pawel, Linke Axel, Ischinger Thomas, Klauss Volker, Eberli Franz, Corti Roberto, Wijns William, Morice Marie-Claude, di Mario Carlo, Meier Bernhard, Jüni Peter, Yazdani Ashkan, Copt Samuel, Windecker Stephan, Serruys Patrick W. First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26344.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.