Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society · 2021
"Subclinical atherosclerosis in acromegaly: Possible association with cardiovascular risk factors rather than disease activity".
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Almeida Maria Cristina Costa, Freire Claudia Maria Vilas, Nunes Maria do Carmo P, Soares Beatriz Santana, Barbosa Marcia M, Giannetti Alexandre Varella, Zille Giancarlo Pereira, Miranda Paulo Augusto Carvalho, Ribeiro-Oliveira Antonio, Drummond Juliana Beaudette
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is still a major cause of excessive morbidity and mortality in patients with active acromegaly, which may be attributed to a high prevalence of associated pro-atherosclerotic risk factors. However, a direct effect of GH/IGF-1 excess on the vasculature has been previously suggested, warranting further investigation. The present study was designed to investigate whether chronic GH/IGF-1 excess is associated with an increased prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with acromegaly.
DESIGN: We measured carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and assessed carotid plaques by ultrasonography along with classical CV risk factors in 54 acromegaly patients (34 females, 50 ± 12 years and compared those with 62 (42 females, 53 ± 13 years) age-, sex- and CV risk factors- matched controls. In order to compare cIMT measurements between patients and controls we analyzed common carotid artery far wall data as well as a combined measurement result, which consisted of the mean value of the six different measurements, three at each side.
RESULTS: mean ± SD serum GH and IGF-1 levels were 2.76 ± 4.65 ng/mL and 1.7 ± 1.25 x ULN, respectively, in all acromegaly patients. Age, body mass index, blood pressure, lipid levels, fasting glucose and Framingham's global cardiovascular risk score classification were similar comparing patients and controls. Combined median [IQR] cIMT measurements were similar in acromegaly patients and matched controls (0.59 [0.52-0.66] mm vs. 0.59 [0.52-0.69] mm; P = 0.872) as well as in acromegaly patients with active and controlled disease (0.59 [0.51-0.68] mm vs. 0.60 [0.54-0.68] mm; P = 0.385). No significant correlations were observed between cIMT measurements and GH (Spearman r = 0.1, P = 0.49) or IGF-1 (Spearman r = 0.13, P = 0.37) levels in patients with acromegaly. Carotid atherosclerotic plaques prevalence was similar in patients and controls (26% vs. 32%; P = 0.54) as well as in patients with active and controlled acromegaly (22% vs. 30%; P = 0.537).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that GH/IGF-1 excess itself is not one of the main drivers of subclinical morphological atherosclerosis changes in patients with acromegaly and that optimal control of acromegaly-associated CV risk factors may preserve vasculature structure even when strict biochemical control is not achieved.
DESIGN: We measured carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and assessed carotid plaques by ultrasonography along with classical CV risk factors in 54 acromegaly patients (34 females, 50 ± 12 years and compared those with 62 (42 females, 53 ± 13 years) age-, sex- and CV risk factors- matched controls. In order to compare cIMT measurements between patients and controls we analyzed common carotid artery far wall data as well as a combined measurement result, which consisted of the mean value of the six different measurements, three at each side.
RESULTS: mean ± SD serum GH and IGF-1 levels were 2.76 ± 4.65 ng/mL and 1.7 ± 1.25 x ULN, respectively, in all acromegaly patients. Age, body mass index, blood pressure, lipid levels, fasting glucose and Framingham's global cardiovascular risk score classification were similar comparing patients and controls. Combined median [IQR] cIMT measurements were similar in acromegaly patients and matched controls (0.59 [0.52-0.66] mm vs. 0.59 [0.52-0.69] mm; P = 0.872) as well as in acromegaly patients with active and controlled disease (0.59 [0.51-0.68] mm vs. 0.60 [0.54-0.68] mm; P = 0.385). No significant correlations were observed between cIMT measurements and GH (Spearman r = 0.1, P = 0.49) or IGF-1 (Spearman r = 0.13, P = 0.37) levels in patients with acromegaly. Carotid atherosclerotic plaques prevalence was similar in patients and controls (26% vs. 32%; P = 0.54) as well as in patients with active and controlled acromegaly (22% vs. 30%; P = 0.537).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that GH/IGF-1 excess itself is not one of the main drivers of subclinical morphological atherosclerosis changes in patients with acromegaly and that optimal control of acromegaly-associated CV risk factors may preserve vasculature structure even when strict biochemical control is not achieved.