DEN open · 2025
Factors Influencing Resection Time in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakatani Shinya, Hayasaka Junnosuke, Ishii Tsuyoshi, Oda Minoru, Kawai Yusuke, Yamato Hiroshi, Ochiai Yorinari, Suzuki Yugo, Mitsunaga Yutaka, Odagiri Hiroyuki, Matsui Akira, Miura Yasuro, Hoteya Shu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is well established. However, factors influencing resection time remain unclear. This study aimed to identify these factors during ESD for rectal NETs.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 194 rectal NET lesions that were treated with ESD at our institution between March 2011 and July 2024. Potential factors influencing resection time-including age, sex, operator experience (non-expert endoscopist: <50 colorectal ESD cases), sodium hyaluronate use, traction device (TD) use, tumor location, lesion size, and specimen area-were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: The median resection time was 30 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-43 min). Non-expert endoscopists performed 53% of the procedures. The median specimen area was 302 mm2 (IQR: 233-393 mm2). Resection time was significantly longer when procedures were performed by non-experts (β = 8.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.46-12.86; p <0.001), when the tumor was located in the upper rectum (Rs) compared to the lower rectum (Rb) (β = 20.96; 95% CI: 7.82-34.1; p = 0.002), and with increasing specimen area (β = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.027-0.06; p <0.001). Conversely, TD use significantly shortened resection time (β = -5.90; 95% CI: -11.37 to -0.43; p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: Traction device use during ESD for rectal NETs is associated with shorter resection time; whereas, procedures performed by non-experts, tumors located in the Rs, and larger specimen areas were associated with longer resection time.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 194 rectal NET lesions that were treated with ESD at our institution between March 2011 and July 2024. Potential factors influencing resection time-including age, sex, operator experience (non-expert endoscopist: <50 colorectal ESD cases), sodium hyaluronate use, traction device (TD) use, tumor location, lesion size, and specimen area-were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: The median resection time was 30 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-43 min). Non-expert endoscopists performed 53% of the procedures. The median specimen area was 302 mm2 (IQR: 233-393 mm2). Resection time was significantly longer when procedures were performed by non-experts (β = 8.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.46-12.86; p <0.001), when the tumor was located in the upper rectum (Rs) compared to the lower rectum (Rb) (β = 20.96; 95% CI: 7.82-34.1; p = 0.002), and with increasing specimen area (β = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.027-0.06; p <0.001). Conversely, TD use significantly shortened resection time (β = -5.90; 95% CI: -11.37 to -0.43; p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: Traction device use during ESD for rectal NETs is associated with shorter resection time; whereas, procedures performed by non-experts, tumors located in the Rs, and larger specimen areas were associated with longer resection time.