Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025
Efficacy of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Ensure Adequate Submucosal Layer for T1b Colorectal Carcinomas of 20-30 mm in Diameter.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takehara Yudai, Yamashita Ken, Morimoto Shin, Tanino Fumiaki, Yamamoto Noriko, Kamigaichi Yuki, Tanaka Hidenori, Takigawa Hidehiko, Urabe Yuji, Kuwai Toshio, Arihiro Koji, Oka Shiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Although hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained popularity over the years, its usefulness in ensuring an adequate submucosal [SM] layer for T1b (SM invasion depth ≥1,000 μm) colorectal carcinoma (CRC) remains unknown. We retrospectively compared conventional ESD (C-ESD) with planned hybrid ESD (PH-ESD) for cT1b CRCs measuring 20-30 mm.
METHODS: We analyzed 71 consecutive cases of cT1b CRC (20-30 mm). The patients were classified into C-ESD (n=38), PH-ESD (n=21), or salvage hybrid ESD (n=12) groups. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics, including resected SM and vertical margin (VM) distance, and outcomes between the C-ESD and PH-ESD groups. We also investigated the factors leading to VM positivity (VM1).
RESULTS: The PH-ESD group exhibited a significantly shorter procedure time (40.5 vs. 60.5 min) and a significantly higher rate of VM ≥500 μm (81.0% vs. 47.4%) compared to the C-ESD group. Regarding superficial tumors, the PH-ESD group exhibited significantly longer resected SM (1,243 vs. 837 μm) and VM (545 vs. 302 μm) distances and a significantly higher rate of VM ≥500 μm (72.7% vs. 14.3%) than the C-ESD group. All VM1 lesions were resected using C-ESD or salvage hybrid ESD. VM1 lesions exhibited significantly higher rates of poorly differentiated histology at the deepest invasive front (71.9% vs. 14.3%) and perioperative perforation (28.6% vs. 0%) than VM-negative lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: PH-ESD for 20-30-mm T1b CRCs may be more useful than C-ESD in terms of procedure time, especially for superficial lesions, ensuring a longer resected SM distance and VM ≥500 μm.
METHODS: We analyzed 71 consecutive cases of cT1b CRC (20-30 mm). The patients were classified into C-ESD (n=38), PH-ESD (n=21), or salvage hybrid ESD (n=12) groups. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics, including resected SM and vertical margin (VM) distance, and outcomes between the C-ESD and PH-ESD groups. We also investigated the factors leading to VM positivity (VM1).
RESULTS: The PH-ESD group exhibited a significantly shorter procedure time (40.5 vs. 60.5 min) and a significantly higher rate of VM ≥500 μm (81.0% vs. 47.4%) compared to the C-ESD group. Regarding superficial tumors, the PH-ESD group exhibited significantly longer resected SM (1,243 vs. 837 μm) and VM (545 vs. 302 μm) distances and a significantly higher rate of VM ≥500 μm (72.7% vs. 14.3%) than the C-ESD group. All VM1 lesions were resected using C-ESD or salvage hybrid ESD. VM1 lesions exhibited significantly higher rates of poorly differentiated histology at the deepest invasive front (71.9% vs. 14.3%) and perioperative perforation (28.6% vs. 0%) than VM-negative lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: PH-ESD for 20-30-mm T1b CRCs may be more useful than C-ESD in terms of procedure time, especially for superficial lesions, ensuring a longer resected SM distance and VM ≥500 μm.