Neurosurgery · 2005
Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha, Deshmukh Pushpa, Zabramski Joseph M, Preul Mark C, Crawford Neil R, Siwanuwatn Rungsak, Spetzler Robert F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the angles of approach and area of exposure to the anterior communicating artery (AComA) complex associated with pterional (PT), orbitopterional (OPT), and orbitozygomatic (OZ) craniotomies before and after gyrus rectus resection.
METHODS: PT, OPT, and OZ craniotomies were performed on both sides of four heads, and the angles of approach and area of exposure to the AComA complex were measured before and after resection of the gyrus rectus.
RESULTS: The vertical angle of approach increased significantly among the PT and OPT (P = 0.001), PT and OZ (P = 0.001), and OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.005). The horizontal angle of approach was significantly larger between the PT to OPT (P = 0.001) and PT to OZ (P = 0.001) approaches but not between the OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.757). After gyrus rectus resection, the vertical and horizontal angles of approach increased significantly for the PT approach but not for the OPT and OZ approaches. The area of exposure to the AComA complex increased progressively from the PT to OPT to OZ approach but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.124). Resection of the gyrus rectus resulted in significant relative gains in the area of exposure for the PT (P = 0.01) and OPT (P = 0.04) approaches but not for the OZ approach (P = 0.88).
CONCLUSION: The vertical and horizontal angles of approach to the AComA complex are significantly larger for the OPT and OZ approaches compared with the PT approach. Use of the OZ approach may decrease the need for frontal lobe retraction and resection of the gyrus rectus.
METHODS: PT, OPT, and OZ craniotomies were performed on both sides of four heads, and the angles of approach and area of exposure to the AComA complex were measured before and after resection of the gyrus rectus.
RESULTS: The vertical angle of approach increased significantly among the PT and OPT (P = 0.001), PT and OZ (P = 0.001), and OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.005). The horizontal angle of approach was significantly larger between the PT to OPT (P = 0.001) and PT to OZ (P = 0.001) approaches but not between the OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.757). After gyrus rectus resection, the vertical and horizontal angles of approach increased significantly for the PT approach but not for the OPT and OZ approaches. The area of exposure to the AComA complex increased progressively from the PT to OPT to OZ approach but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.124). Resection of the gyrus rectus resulted in significant relative gains in the area of exposure for the PT (P = 0.01) and OPT (P = 0.04) approaches but not for the OZ approach (P = 0.88).
CONCLUSION: The vertical and horizontal angles of approach to the AComA complex are significantly larger for the OPT and OZ approaches compared with the PT approach. Use of the OZ approach may decrease the need for frontal lobe retraction and resection of the gyrus rectus.