MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27736

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2024

Treatment discordance in the utilization of neck dissection for stage I-II supraglottic tumors.

Gilja Shivee, Vasan Vikram, Kumar Arvind, Roof Scott A, Genden Eric M, Kirke Diana N

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines began recommending the use of neck dissection during surgical management of stage I-II supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

METHODS

Trends and factors associated with the use of neck dissection during larynx-preserving surgery for patients with cT1-2, N0, M0 supraglottic LSCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2020) were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 2080 patients who satisfied study eligibility criteria, 633 (30.4%) underwent neck dissection. Between 2018 and 2020, the rate of neck dissection was 39.0% (114/292). After multivariable adjustment, academic facility type, undergoing biopsy prior to surgery, and more radical surgery were significant predictors of receiving neck dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this national analysis suggest that the utilization of guideline-concordant neck dissection for management of stage I-II supraglottic LSCC remains low and highlight the need to promote the practice of neck dissection for this patient population.

Для цитирования: Gilja Shivee, Vasan Vikram, Kumar Arvind, Roof Scott A, Genden Eric M, Kirke Diana N. Treatment discordance in the utilization of neck dissection for stage I-II supraglottic tumors.. Head & neck. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27736.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.