Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2004
Validity of the minimum data set in identifying urinary tract infections in residents of long-term care facilities.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stevenson Kurt B, Moore James W, Sleeper Barbara
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine the validity of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to detect cases of urinary tract infection (UTI) that meet specific evidence-based criteria.
DESIGN: Prospective surveillance.
SETTING: Sixteen long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Idaho.
PARTICIPANTS: Residents of participating LTCFs for whom an MDS form was completed.
MEASUREMENTS: Prospective surveillance of all types of infection, including UTI, and data collection on clinical manifestation, microbiology, and treatment; MDS data on identification of UTI.
RESULTS: A stratified analysis demonstrated that the validity of MDS was 14% when using the evidence-based criteria for UTIs as the criterion standard. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of MDS entries were 57.9% and 86.5%, respectively. The estimated positive and negative predictive values for the study population were 13.9% and 98.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MDS has the potential to be an important measure of quality in the long-term care setting. When used to detect residents with UTIs, it appears to greatly overestimate the number of cases while adequately screening out residents without UTIs. These problems may be overcome by providing more-explicit definitions for UTIs to be used by providers when completing MDS information on individual residents.
DESIGN: Prospective surveillance.
SETTING: Sixteen long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Idaho.
PARTICIPANTS: Residents of participating LTCFs for whom an MDS form was completed.
MEASUREMENTS: Prospective surveillance of all types of infection, including UTI, and data collection on clinical manifestation, microbiology, and treatment; MDS data on identification of UTI.
RESULTS: A stratified analysis demonstrated that the validity of MDS was 14% when using the evidence-based criteria for UTIs as the criterion standard. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of MDS entries were 57.9% and 86.5%, respectively. The estimated positive and negative predictive values for the study population were 13.9% and 98.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MDS has the potential to be an important measure of quality in the long-term care setting. When used to detect residents with UTIs, it appears to greatly overestimate the number of cases while adequately screening out residents without UTIs. These problems may be overcome by providing more-explicit definitions for UTIs to be used by providers when completing MDS information on individual residents.