Respiratory care · 2023
Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gonzalez Ivan, Dominguez Camila B, Di Salvo Emanuel, Loustau Malena P, Acevedo Valeria S, Celano Melisa D, Melero Juan C, Bianchini Facundo Jf, Gutierrez Facundo J, Mariani Javier, Murias Gastón, Plotnikow Gustavo A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers.
METHODS: A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
RESULTS: A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H2O from the initial pressure (Pinitial) (P < .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H2O was lost during connection (difference between Pinitial and Pconnection). The Preconnection value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H2O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H2O (difference between Pinitial and Preconnection) (P < .001). The Pfinal mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H2O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.
METHODS: A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
RESULTS: A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H2O from the initial pressure (Pinitial) (P < .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H2O was lost during connection (difference between Pinitial and Pconnection). The Preconnection value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H2O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H2O (difference between Pinitial and Preconnection) (P < .001). The Pfinal mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H2O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.