Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2016
The effect of serum vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve markers: a prospective cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Drakopoulos Panagiotis, van de Vijver Arne, Schutyser Valerie, Milatovic Stevan, Anckaert Ellen, Schiettecatte Johan, Blockeel Christophe, Camus Michel, Tournaye Herman, Polyzos Nikolaos P
Аннотация
STUDY QUESTION: Is there any association between serum 25-OH vitamin D levels and ovarian reserve markers in infertile women?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Vitamin D is not associated with the ovarian reserve markers, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC), in infertile women.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The mechanism underlying the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and reproduction is still unclear; however, evidence indicates a potential direct negative impact on ovarian function. This is mainly due to the fact that gonadal function may be altered by vitamin D deficiency, as observed by the expression of vitamin D receptor mRNA in human ovaries, mixed ovarian cell cultures and granulosa cell cultures. On the other hand, results from clinical studies are conflicting, with some suggesting that vitamin D status is associated with ovarian reserve, whereas other cross-sectional studies have not found any significant correlation between vitamin D and AMH levels.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was a prospective cross-sectional study from the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. The duration of the study was one year.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Overall, the study included 283 consecutive infertile women younger than 42 years old and undergoing their first treatment cycle in our institution. All patients were recruited within a time interval of 12 months from the initiation of the study, before undergoing infertility treatment. Women consuming vitamin D supplements or taking medication for systematic disease or women who had undergone ovarian surgery were excluded from the study. All infertile women had serum AMH and vitamin D sampled on the same day. AFC was measured on the second or third day of the first cycle following the blood sampling for the determination of AMH and 25-OH vitamin D levels.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among all patients, 30.7% (n = 87) were vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/mL) whereas 69.3% (n = 196) had normal vitamin D levels (≥20 ng/mL). The mean AMH and AFC levels did not differ significantly between the two groups: AMH 3.9 μ/L (±3.8) versus 4.3 μ/L (±4.8), (P value = 0.5) and AFC 13.9 (±13.3) versus 12.7 (±11.4), (P = 0.7), respectively. No correlation was observed between 25-O H vitamin D and AMH (spearman's r = 0.02, P value = 0.7) or AFC (spearman's r = -0.02, P value = 0.7). In multiple linear regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders (age, BMI, smoking status, infertility cause and season of blood sampling), the regression slope in all participants for total 25OH-D predicting log10 AMH was 0.006 [standard error (SE) = 0.07, P value = 0.9]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between AFC and vitamin D levels, even after controlling for relevant co-variants (regression coefficient -0.09. SE 0.08, P value = 0.2).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this is the first prospective study to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and the most important ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC), we need to acknowledge that the data used to generate the study findings are cross-sectional in nature. In this regard, we cannot generate or exclude any causal effect hypothesis. Nevertheless, our data support that an association between vitamin D and ovarian reserve markers is highly unlikely to exist.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although data from basic research indicate that vitamin D deficiency may have an effect on steroidogenesis and follicular development, our study, by prospectively recruiting a large number of infertile women, clearly demonstrates that vitamin D deficiency is highly unlikely to have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve. Ongoing prospective and translational research projects are currently being conducted in order to evaluate the potential effect of vitamin D deficiency on reproductive outcome mediated through either an effect on the oocyte quality or on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
SUMMARY ANSWER: Vitamin D is not associated with the ovarian reserve markers, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC), in infertile women.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The mechanism underlying the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and reproduction is still unclear; however, evidence indicates a potential direct negative impact on ovarian function. This is mainly due to the fact that gonadal function may be altered by vitamin D deficiency, as observed by the expression of vitamin D receptor mRNA in human ovaries, mixed ovarian cell cultures and granulosa cell cultures. On the other hand, results from clinical studies are conflicting, with some suggesting that vitamin D status is associated with ovarian reserve, whereas other cross-sectional studies have not found any significant correlation between vitamin D and AMH levels.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was a prospective cross-sectional study from the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. The duration of the study was one year.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Overall, the study included 283 consecutive infertile women younger than 42 years old and undergoing their first treatment cycle in our institution. All patients were recruited within a time interval of 12 months from the initiation of the study, before undergoing infertility treatment. Women consuming vitamin D supplements or taking medication for systematic disease or women who had undergone ovarian surgery were excluded from the study. All infertile women had serum AMH and vitamin D sampled on the same day. AFC was measured on the second or third day of the first cycle following the blood sampling for the determination of AMH and 25-OH vitamin D levels.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among all patients, 30.7% (n = 87) were vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/mL) whereas 69.3% (n = 196) had normal vitamin D levels (≥20 ng/mL). The mean AMH and AFC levels did not differ significantly between the two groups: AMH 3.9 μ/L (±3.8) versus 4.3 μ/L (±4.8), (P value = 0.5) and AFC 13.9 (±13.3) versus 12.7 (±11.4), (P = 0.7), respectively. No correlation was observed between 25-O H vitamin D and AMH (spearman's r = 0.02, P value = 0.7) or AFC (spearman's r = -0.02, P value = 0.7). In multiple linear regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders (age, BMI, smoking status, infertility cause and season of blood sampling), the regression slope in all participants for total 25OH-D predicting log10 AMH was 0.006 [standard error (SE) = 0.07, P value = 0.9]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between AFC and vitamin D levels, even after controlling for relevant co-variants (regression coefficient -0.09. SE 0.08, P value = 0.2).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this is the first prospective study to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and the most important ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC), we need to acknowledge that the data used to generate the study findings are cross-sectional in nature. In this regard, we cannot generate or exclude any causal effect hypothesis. Nevertheless, our data support that an association between vitamin D and ovarian reserve markers is highly unlikely to exist.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although data from basic research indicate that vitamin D deficiency may have an effect on steroidogenesis and follicular development, our study, by prospectively recruiting a large number of infertile women, clearly demonstrates that vitamin D deficiency is highly unlikely to have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve. Ongoing prospective and translational research projects are currently being conducted in order to evaluate the potential effect of vitamin D deficiency on reproductive outcome mediated through either an effect on the oocyte quality or on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.