Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2019
Salvage Re-irradiation With Single-modality Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Gynaecological Tumours in the Pelvis: A Multi-institutional Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Raziee H, D'Souza D, Velker V, Barnes E, Taggar A, Mendez L, Leung E
Аннотация
AIMS: Recurrent gynaecological tumours can cause significant morbidity with limited salvage options. This study investigates the strategy of salvage single-modality interstitial brachytherapy (SM-ISBT) for recurrent gynaecological pelvic cancer at two specialised ISBT centres.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had received salvage SM-ISBT for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological cancers from September 2008 to January 2017 were included. None had distant metastasis at the time of recurrence. Local control, progression-free and overall survival and long-term toxicities were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 2.5-106.3 months) after SM-ISBT were included. Primary cancer sites were endometrium (20), cervix (4), vulva (1) and vagina (1). All patients had prior whole-pelvic external beam irradiation and 16 had prior brachytherapy. The median disease-free survival prior to SM-ISBT was 20.3 months (interquartile range 9.9-30.5). SM-ISBT was delivered with high dose rate technique over three to six fractions. The median high-risk clinical target volume was 34.6 cm3, with a median D90 of 29.1 Gy (range 16.1-64.6). The median bladder, rectum and sigmoid D2cm3 were 15.5, 18.7 and 3.7 Gy, respectively. After SM-ISBT, complete and partial responses were achieved in 17 (64%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two (7.4%) patients had grade 3 toxicities (both vaginal stenosis), with no grade 4 complications. Eighteen patients (69%) recurred, including local, regional and metastatic in 14 (54%), 8 (30%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 50, 38 and 78%, respectively. In follow-up, 12 patients (46%) remained in local control.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage SM-ISBT re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological malignancies was feasible and safe. With limited salvage options, the local control obtained in more than a quarter of patients seems reasonable. Further efforts are needed to establish a consensus about the optimal patient selection, dose fractionation, implant technique and combination with systemic therapies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had received salvage SM-ISBT for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological cancers from September 2008 to January 2017 were included. None had distant metastasis at the time of recurrence. Local control, progression-free and overall survival and long-term toxicities were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 2.5-106.3 months) after SM-ISBT were included. Primary cancer sites were endometrium (20), cervix (4), vulva (1) and vagina (1). All patients had prior whole-pelvic external beam irradiation and 16 had prior brachytherapy. The median disease-free survival prior to SM-ISBT was 20.3 months (interquartile range 9.9-30.5). SM-ISBT was delivered with high dose rate technique over three to six fractions. The median high-risk clinical target volume was 34.6 cm3, with a median D90 of 29.1 Gy (range 16.1-64.6). The median bladder, rectum and sigmoid D2cm3 were 15.5, 18.7 and 3.7 Gy, respectively. After SM-ISBT, complete and partial responses were achieved in 17 (64%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two (7.4%) patients had grade 3 toxicities (both vaginal stenosis), with no grade 4 complications. Eighteen patients (69%) recurred, including local, regional and metastatic in 14 (54%), 8 (30%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 50, 38 and 78%, respectively. In follow-up, 12 patients (46%) remained in local control.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage SM-ISBT re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological malignancies was feasible and safe. With limited salvage options, the local control obtained in more than a quarter of patients seems reasonable. Further efforts are needed to establish a consensus about the optimal patient selection, dose fractionation, implant technique and combination with systemic therapies.