Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique · 2019
[Secondary labiaplasty: Retrospective study about 44 cases. Annual report SOFCPRE 2019].
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smarrito S, Brambilla M, Berreni N, Paniel B-J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Labiaplasty is a surgery currently booming. The number of publications on this subject is also increasing significantly. With the increase of the operated cases, we see more and more consultations for revisions after a labiaplasty, called secondary labiaplasty. The author reports here his experience with secondary labiaplasties in 44 cases.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study carried out by the author reports 44 cases divided into two categories of secondary labiaplasties. The first category is characterized by a wound dehiscence, including those following the author's lambda laser procedures, which are easily repaired under local anesthesia after border cutting and suture. The second category is characterized by over-resections or real amputations or even remains of atypical flaps.
DISCUSSION: The over-resection is a technical fault. In this case, the technique used to improve the aesthetic, functional and psychological aspect is the use of the remains of labia minora in the form of a flap to avoid a dog-ear appearance at the anterior and posterior part. The use of lipofilling of the labia majora is to mask the area and improve the function. The future of this surgery is probably the reconstruction of the labia minora by local flaps.
CONCLUSION: The conclusion of the study is that it is imperative that surgeons performing labiaplasties be trained in both anatomy and labiaplasty techniques and avoid as much as possible over-resections and amputations, mending being often difficult.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study carried out by the author reports 44 cases divided into two categories of secondary labiaplasties. The first category is characterized by a wound dehiscence, including those following the author's lambda laser procedures, which are easily repaired under local anesthesia after border cutting and suture. The second category is characterized by over-resections or real amputations or even remains of atypical flaps.
DISCUSSION: The over-resection is a technical fault. In this case, the technique used to improve the aesthetic, functional and psychological aspect is the use of the remains of labia minora in the form of a flap to avoid a dog-ear appearance at the anterior and posterior part. The use of lipofilling of the labia majora is to mask the area and improve the function. The future of this surgery is probably the reconstruction of the labia minora by local flaps.
CONCLUSION: The conclusion of the study is that it is imperative that surgeons performing labiaplasties be trained in both anatomy and labiaplasty techniques and avoid as much as possible over-resections and amputations, mending being often difficult.