Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic tools to predict treatment response in patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies show variable efficacy for patients with CF. Patient-derived predictive tools may identify individuals likely to respond to CFTRs, but are not in routine use. We aimed to determine the cost-utility of predictive tool-guided treatment with CFTRs as add-on to standard of care (SoC) for individuals with CF.

METHODS

This economic evaluation compared two strategies using an individual level simulation: (i) Treat All, where all patients received CFTRs plus SoC and (ii) Test→Treat, where patients who tested positive on predictive tools received CFTRs plus SoC and those who tested negative received SoC only. We simulated 50,000 individuals over their lifetime, and estimated costs (2020 CAD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the healthcare payer's perspective, discounted at 1.5% annually. The model was populated using Canadian CF registry data and published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity were conducted.

RESULTS

The Treat All and Test→Treat and strategies yielded 22.41 and 21.36 QALYs, and cost $4.21 M and $3.15 M respectively. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that Test→Treat was highly cost-effective compared to Treat All in 100% of simulations at cost-effectiveness thresholds as high as $500,000 per QALY. Test→Treat may save between $931 K to $1.1 M per QALY lost, depending on sensitivity and specificity of predictive tools.

CONCLUSION

The use of predictive tools could optimize the health benefits of CFTR modulators while reducing costs. Our findings support the use of pre-treatment predictive testing and may help inform coverage and reimbursement policies for individuals with CF.