Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie · 2019
[Functional or aesthetic labia minora reduction: Complications, revision surgeries and results - a comparative study].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lallemant M, Porté C, Laroche J, Andreoletti J B, Gay C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the complications, the rate of revision surgeries and the long-term patient postoperative satisfaction level for the two main indications of labia minora reduction: aesthetic or functional.
METHODS: A comparative, retrospective and multicentered study was carried out in Belfort and Montbéliard hospitals between January 2010 and January 2017. Ninety-two primary labia minora reductions for labia minora hypertrophy have been listed. Each patient has been requested to fill in a questionnaire about the main indication of labiaplasty, any potential complication, a revision surgery and her level of the satisfaction. Patients who had agreed to respond were divided into two groups: a "functional indication" group (FI) and an "aesthetic indication" group (AI).
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (40%) answered the survey: 19 (51%) have been included in the FI group and the remaining 18 (49%) in the AI group. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 3.2 years. We identified 13 patients (35%) who encountered a postoperative complication. It predominates in the FI group (53% versus 17%, P=0.04). Seven patients (19%) were treated by revision surgeries. All of them belonged to the IF group. Whatever the indication of the labiaplasty, 86% of the patients have been satisfied by the outcomes.
CONCLUSION: A labia minora reduction is a highly appreciated surgical treatment on the long term whatever the initial surgical indication. However, postoperative complications and revision surgeries are not negligible especially when the main indication is functional.
METHODS: A comparative, retrospective and multicentered study was carried out in Belfort and Montbéliard hospitals between January 2010 and January 2017. Ninety-two primary labia minora reductions for labia minora hypertrophy have been listed. Each patient has been requested to fill in a questionnaire about the main indication of labiaplasty, any potential complication, a revision surgery and her level of the satisfaction. Patients who had agreed to respond were divided into two groups: a "functional indication" group (FI) and an "aesthetic indication" group (AI).
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (40%) answered the survey: 19 (51%) have been included in the FI group and the remaining 18 (49%) in the AI group. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 3.2 years. We identified 13 patients (35%) who encountered a postoperative complication. It predominates in the FI group (53% versus 17%, P=0.04). Seven patients (19%) were treated by revision surgeries. All of them belonged to the IF group. Whatever the indication of the labiaplasty, 86% of the patients have been satisfied by the outcomes.
CONCLUSION: A labia minora reduction is a highly appreciated surgical treatment on the long term whatever the initial surgical indication. However, postoperative complications and revision surgeries are not negligible especially when the main indication is functional.