Croatian medical journal · 2023
The impact of earthquakes on the frequency and prognosis of the most common emergency cardiac conditions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Babić Zdravko, Pavlov Marin, Radić Petra, Šikić Josica, Galić Edvard, Balenović Diana, Letilović Tomislav, Horvat Davor, Perčin Luka, Šipuš Dubravka, Valentina Obadić Valentina, Miličić Davor
Аннотация
AIM: To assess whether the number of patients with a cardiac chief complaint and their characteristics differed between before and after two major earthquakes that struck Croatia in 2020.
METHODS: We collected data on all visits of patients with a cardiac chief complaint examined in the emergency departments of six hospitals nearest to the epicenters. Patients seen during the 7 days before the earthquake were compared with those seen on the day and during the 6 days after the earthquake.
RESULTS: Patients seen after the earthquake were younger (68 [59-79] vs 72.5 [65-80]; P<0.001) and less frequently had cardiovascular disease (32.9% vs 42.8%; P<0.001). This group less frequently had the primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (15.6% vs 21.9%; P=0.005), heart failure (9.3% vs 19.4%; P<0.001), dysregulated hypertension (13.9% vs 19.4%; P=0.01), but more frequently had non-anginal chest discomfort (28.8% vs 18.0%; P<0.001). In a subgroup analysis of patients seen in hospitals located within 20 km from the epicenter, significantly more patients seen after the earthquake compared with those seen before the earthquake presented with AMI (14.5% vs 22.8%; P=0.028), acute elevation of blood pressure (10% vs 21.8%, P=0.001), and paroxysmal arrhythmias treated with electrocardioversion (0.9% vs 4.5%, P=0.022).
CONCLUSION: After two moderately strong earthquakes, hospitals within 20 km from the epicenter saw a significant increase in acute cardiac conditions such as elevated blood pressure, AMI, and cardioverted arrhythmias. Eventually, these earthquakes had no impact on the outcomes of the studied population.
METHODS: We collected data on all visits of patients with a cardiac chief complaint examined in the emergency departments of six hospitals nearest to the epicenters. Patients seen during the 7 days before the earthquake were compared with those seen on the day and during the 6 days after the earthquake.
RESULTS: Patients seen after the earthquake were younger (68 [59-79] vs 72.5 [65-80]; P<0.001) and less frequently had cardiovascular disease (32.9% vs 42.8%; P<0.001). This group less frequently had the primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (15.6% vs 21.9%; P=0.005), heart failure (9.3% vs 19.4%; P<0.001), dysregulated hypertension (13.9% vs 19.4%; P=0.01), but more frequently had non-anginal chest discomfort (28.8% vs 18.0%; P<0.001). In a subgroup analysis of patients seen in hospitals located within 20 km from the epicenter, significantly more patients seen after the earthquake compared with those seen before the earthquake presented with AMI (14.5% vs 22.8%; P=0.028), acute elevation of blood pressure (10% vs 21.8%, P=0.001), and paroxysmal arrhythmias treated with electrocardioversion (0.9% vs 4.5%, P=0.022).
CONCLUSION: After two moderately strong earthquakes, hospitals within 20 km from the epicenter saw a significant increase in acute cardiac conditions such as elevated blood pressure, AMI, and cardioverted arrhythmias. Eventually, these earthquakes had no impact on the outcomes of the studied population.