The Medical journal of Australia · 1991
Legal aspects of the management of chronic pain.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mendelson G, Mendelson D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To review the legal provisions which control the prescription of opioid analgesics in Australia, and to summarise the areas in which practitioners who treat patients with chronic pain may expect to become involved with the legal system.
DATA SOURCES: The relevant legislation was reviewed, and a selective review was undertaken of literature dealing with the legal aspects of pain and suffering which may form a basis for personal injury claims. Case law which deals with issues of consent to treatment was also examined.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Statutory requirements which control the prescription of opioids were summarised. Leading cases on patient consent were discussed to clarify for the practitioner the principles which the Courts use in the assessment of the validity of the consent given by patients for treatment. The assessment of the pain patient involved in litigation was briefly discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The prescription and administration of opioid analgesics must be in accordance with the legislative provisions. Treatment options must be discussed and explained to patients so that valid consent can be obtained. Patients' questions must be answered in full, and documentation in the clinical record is required.
DATA SOURCES: The relevant legislation was reviewed, and a selective review was undertaken of literature dealing with the legal aspects of pain and suffering which may form a basis for personal injury claims. Case law which deals with issues of consent to treatment was also examined.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Statutory requirements which control the prescription of opioids were summarised. Leading cases on patient consent were discussed to clarify for the practitioner the principles which the Courts use in the assessment of the validity of the consent given by patients for treatment. The assessment of the pain patient involved in litigation was briefly discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The prescription and administration of opioid analgesics must be in accordance with the legislative provisions. Treatment options must be discussed and explained to patients so that valid consent can be obtained. Patients' questions must be answered in full, and documentation in the clinical record is required.