MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1932296819890865

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019

A Review of the First Long-term Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Available in the United States.

Cowart Kevin

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin, rates of adoption have been low. A novel approach, with the use of a long-term implantable continuous glucose monitoring (LTI CGM) has the potential to overcome barriers to rtCGM. The purpose of this review is to provide a background on the first LTI CGM technology to be approved, along with a review of contraindications, interference, safety, accuracy, and efficacy. Considerations for patient selection are discussed based on the available evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for keywords and subject headings to identify studies assessing LTI CGM.

RESULTS

Seven studies were identified which assessed LTI CGM. Mean absolute relative difference is similar to available CGM devices. Rates of adverse events were low. Change in hemoglobin A1c with LTI CGM may be comparable to rtCGM.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, LTI CGM appears to be safe and accurate. Additional clinical trial investigation is warranted to evaluate the glycemic efficacy of LTI CGM.

Для цитирования: Cowart Kevin. A Review of the First Long-term Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Available in the United States.. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819890865.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.