Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Cumulative Effect of Metabolic Factors on Hepatic Steatosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Egresi Anna, Kozma Brigitta, Karácsony Márton, Rónaszéki Aladár, Werling Klára, Csongrády Barbara, Novák Pál Kaposi, Folhoffer Anikó, Szijártó Attila, Hagymási Krisztina
Аннотация
Background/Objectives: Hepatic steatosis, a hallmark of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is closely associated with systemic metabolic dysfunction. However, the cumulative impact of metabolic risk factors on liver fat content remains underexplored. To evaluate the association between metabolic risk factors and hepatic steatosis severity using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MR-PDFF) measurement, and to assess the cumulative effect of multiple metabolic abnormalities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, MASLD patients (n = 132, aged ≥ 18 years, age: 61.3 ± 10.3, male: 54, female: 78) underwent metabolic risk assessment and MR-PDFF liver fat content measurement. The association between certain metabolic risk scores (obesity/overweight, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes mellitus) both continuous and categorized, as well as liver fat content was analyzed using linear regression models. The cumulative effect of increasing metabolic risk was further explored with subgroup comparisons. Results: A significant positive association was observed between continuous metabolic risk scores and MR-PDFF values (β = 0.021, p < 0.001). Participants with higher cumulative metabolic risk (4 and 5 risk factors group) showed significantly higher liver fat content compared to the reference group (p < 0.01) (MetfO0 = 5.7 ± 5.9%; MetfO1 = 11.6 ± 9.5%; MetfO2 = 7.9 ± 5.6%; MetfO3 = 10.2 ± 7.9%; MetfO4 = 16.4 ± 11.0%; MetfO5 = 17.8 ± 9.5%). Intermediate metabolic risk categories showed a trend toward increased steatosis but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Cumulative metabolic risk is strongly associated with increased hepatic fat accumulation. These findings underscore the need for early identification and management of metabolic risk factors to prevent the development and progression of hepatic steatosis.