Health science reports · 2025
Radiofrequency Ablation as an Alternative and Novel Procedure in the Intraepithelial Neoplasia Management: A Systematic Scoping Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reihani Hamid, Ebrahimi-Dehkordi Sepehr, Moshfeghinia Reza, Ghiasi-Nejad Amirhossein, Noorizadeh Kiarash, Heidari-Soureshjani Reza
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for eliminating intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). We reviewed current evidence investigating the role of RFA in managing different types of IEN.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to assess the current evidence for the use of RFA in managing various types of IEN. A three-step search strategy was employed, involving keyword extraction, comprehensive database searching (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar), and reference screening.
RESULTS: Thirty-two articles were included in this review, and most of the literature reported the features of RFA in the esophagus-related IENs (68.7%). RFA treatment was also found to effectively address gastric (9.3%), anal (12.5%), and cervical (9.3%) IENs. The general opinion on using RFA in Barrett's esophagus (BE) was its combination therapy with the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) methods, which suggested better outcomes than RFA/EMR monotherapy. RFA was not preferred treatment for high-grade gastric dysplasia, but it was effective for the low-grade type.
CONCLUSION: As a minimally invasive, safe, and effective procedure, RFA holds promise for addressing lesions associated with BE, gastric, anal, and cervical IEN; However, the scope and gaps related to RFA therapy require to be explored precisely.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to assess the current evidence for the use of RFA in managing various types of IEN. A three-step search strategy was employed, involving keyword extraction, comprehensive database searching (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar), and reference screening.
RESULTS: Thirty-two articles were included in this review, and most of the literature reported the features of RFA in the esophagus-related IENs (68.7%). RFA treatment was also found to effectively address gastric (9.3%), anal (12.5%), and cervical (9.3%) IENs. The general opinion on using RFA in Barrett's esophagus (BE) was its combination therapy with the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) methods, which suggested better outcomes than RFA/EMR monotherapy. RFA was not preferred treatment for high-grade gastric dysplasia, but it was effective for the low-grade type.
CONCLUSION: As a minimally invasive, safe, and effective procedure, RFA holds promise for addressing lesions associated with BE, gastric, anal, and cervical IEN; However, the scope and gaps related to RFA therapy require to be explored precisely.