British journal of cancer · 2025
Intratumoral bacterial abundance confers poor response to adjuvant gemcitabine in resected pancreatic cancer patients which is mitigated by postoperative antibiotics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guenther Michael, Surendran Sai Agash, Hauer Nina, Fahrenschon Florian, Arslan Muhammed Dervis, Ormanns Steffen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant gemcitabine (aGC) is still a therapeutic mainstay after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but its efficacy is impaired by gram-negative intratumoral bacteria, suggesting a potential therapeutic implication of additive antibiotics. PDAC however, contains several other bacterial strains capable of gemcitabine degradation.
METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization on the samples of a large cohort of resected PDAC patients, we examined how the intratumoral bacterial abundance affected patient outcomes with respect to aGC therapy and whether the use of pre- or postoperative antibiotics (ABT) improved the prognosis. We confirmed the findings in several independent external cohorts.
RESULTS: High intratumoral bacterial abundance impaired aGC efficacy (disease free survival (DFS) 9.4 vs 19.1 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS) 19.4 vs 34.0 months, p < 0.001), which was mitigated by postoperative ABT application (DFS 7.9 vs 12.4 months, p < 0.001, OS 15.2 vs 29.6 months, p < 0.001). Postoperative ABT improved outcome of patients with low bacterial abundance in their tumors (DFS 15.1 vs 34.8 months, p < 0.001, OS 28.5 vs 56.00 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: High intratumoral bacterial abundance may predict poor response to adjuvant gemcitabine treatment, whereas postoperative ABT improves it. We propose postoperative ABT as potential additive treatment before or during aGC therapy after PDAC resection.
METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization on the samples of a large cohort of resected PDAC patients, we examined how the intratumoral bacterial abundance affected patient outcomes with respect to aGC therapy and whether the use of pre- or postoperative antibiotics (ABT) improved the prognosis. We confirmed the findings in several independent external cohorts.
RESULTS: High intratumoral bacterial abundance impaired aGC efficacy (disease free survival (DFS) 9.4 vs 19.1 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS) 19.4 vs 34.0 months, p < 0.001), which was mitigated by postoperative ABT application (DFS 7.9 vs 12.4 months, p < 0.001, OS 15.2 vs 29.6 months, p < 0.001). Postoperative ABT improved outcome of patients with low bacterial abundance in their tumors (DFS 15.1 vs 34.8 months, p < 0.001, OS 28.5 vs 56.00 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: High intratumoral bacterial abundance may predict poor response to adjuvant gemcitabine treatment, whereas postoperative ABT improves it. We propose postoperative ABT as potential additive treatment before or during aGC therapy after PDAC resection.