MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.025

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2016

Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Prognosis, Imaging Predictors, and Potential Management.

Cortés Carlos, Amat-Santos Ignacio J, Nombela-Franco Luis, Muñoz-Garcia Antonio J, Gutiérrez-Ibanes Enrique, De La Torre Hernandez José M, Córdoba-Soriano Juan G, Jimenez-Quevedo Pilar, Hernández-García José M, Gonzalez-Mansilla Ana, Ruano Javier, Jimenez-Mazuecos Jesús, Castrodeza Javier, Tobar Javier, Islas Fabian, Revilla Ana, Puri Rishi, Puerto Ana, Gómez Itziar, Rodés-Cabau Josep, San Román José A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the clinical impact of the degree and improvement of mitral regurgitation in TAVR recipients, validate the main imaging determinants of this improvement, and assess the potential candidates for double valve repair with percutaneous techniques.

BACKGROUND

Many patients with severe aortic stenosis present with concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR). Cardiac imaging plays a key role in identifying prognostic factors of MR persistence after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and for planning its treatment.

METHODS

A total of 1,110 patients with severe aortic stenosis from 6 centers who underwent TAVR were included. In-hospital to 6-month follow-up clinical outcomes according to the degree of baseline MR were evaluated. Off-line analysis of echocardiographic and multidetector computed tomography images was performed to determine predictors of improvement, clinical outcomes, and potential percutaneous alternatives to treat persistent MR.

RESULTS

Compared with patients without significant pre-TAVR MR, 177 patients (16%) presented with significant pre-TAVR MR, experiencing a 3-fold increase in 6-month mortality (35.0% vs. 10.2%; p < 0.001). After TAVR, the degree of MR improved in 60% of them. A mitral annular diameter of >35.5 mm (odds ratio: 9.0; 95% confidence interval: 3.2 to 25.3; p < 0.001) and calcification of the mitral apparatus by multidetector computed tomography (odds ratio: 11.2; 95% confidence interval: 4.03 to 31.3; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of persistent MR. At least 14 patients (1.3% of the entire cohort, 13.1% of patients with persistent MR) met criteria for percutaneous mitral repair with either MitraClip (9.3%) or a balloon-expandable valve (3.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant MR is not uncommon in TAVR recipients and associates with greater mortality. In more than one-half of patients, the degree of MR improves after TAVR, which can be predicted by characterizing the mitral apparatus with multidetector computed tomography. According to standardized imaging criteria, at least 1 in 10 patients whose MR persists after TAVR could benefit from percutaneous mitral procedures, and even more could be treated with MitraClip after dedicated pre-imaging evaluation.

Для цитирования: Cortés Carlos, Amat-Santos Ignacio J, Nombela-Franco Luis, Muñoz-Garcia Antonio J, Gutiérrez-Ibanes Enrique, De La Torre Hernandez José M, Córdoba-Soriano Juan G, Jimenez-Quevedo Pilar, Hernández-García José M, Gonzalez-Mansilla Ana, Ruano Javier, Jimenez-Mazuecos Jesús, Castrodeza Javier, Tobar Javier, Islas Fabian, Revilla Ana, Puri Rishi, Puerto Ana, Gómez Itziar, Rodés-Cabau Josep, San Román José A. Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Prognosis, Imaging Predictors, and Potential Management.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.