Complementary therapies in medicine · 2025
L-ornithine supplementation in periodontitis treatment yields greater benefits than L-arginine after one year: Part II of a randomized controlled pilot study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shynkevych Viktoriya I, Kolomiiets Svitlana V, Udaltsova Kristina O, Kaidashev Igor P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: L-arginine and L-ornithine have previously shown limited short-term immunological benefits in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim of this study was to assess the extended efficacy and durability of the response to L-arginine or L-ornithine as adjuncts to periodontal therapy in adults with periodontitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 75 patients who previously received the course of L-arginine or L-ornithine as adjuncts to professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) during a preliminary randomized short-term part of a clinical trial (NCT05042024) were assessed clinically and immunologically (nested) after 12 months follow-up. The immunological assay included immunohistochemical identification of densities of CD68 + and CD163 + single-positive gingival macrophages. All patients did not receive new prescriptions or dietary changes and underwent personalized steps of periodontal treatment during observation.
RESULTS: After one year, patients who received L-arginine or L-ornithine exhibited a significant reduction of sites with periodontal pocket depth of 4-5 mm compared to PMPR (p < 0.0001). L-ornithine was associated with BoP decreasing compared to PMPR and L-arginine (95 % CI of odds ratio [1.12-1.46], p = 0.0002; CI [0.72-0.94], p = 0.004), CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages density increasing compared to PMPR (p < 0.001) and L-arginine (p < 0.05). L-arginine resulted in increased density of CD68 + macrophages and elevated CD68 + /CD163 + ratio compared to the PMPR and L-ornithine; CI [0.41-0.63], p = 0.009, CI [1.45-2.72], p < 0.0001.
CONCLUSION: After one year, L-ornithine supplementation demonstrated more pronounced clinical benefits than L-arginine, although both can modulate gingival CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 75 patients who previously received the course of L-arginine or L-ornithine as adjuncts to professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) during a preliminary randomized short-term part of a clinical trial (NCT05042024) were assessed clinically and immunologically (nested) after 12 months follow-up. The immunological assay included immunohistochemical identification of densities of CD68 + and CD163 + single-positive gingival macrophages. All patients did not receive new prescriptions or dietary changes and underwent personalized steps of periodontal treatment during observation.
RESULTS: After one year, patients who received L-arginine or L-ornithine exhibited a significant reduction of sites with periodontal pocket depth of 4-5 mm compared to PMPR (p < 0.0001). L-ornithine was associated with BoP decreasing compared to PMPR and L-arginine (95 % CI of odds ratio [1.12-1.46], p = 0.0002; CI [0.72-0.94], p = 0.004), CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages density increasing compared to PMPR (p < 0.001) and L-arginine (p < 0.05). L-arginine resulted in increased density of CD68 + macrophages and elevated CD68 + /CD163 + ratio compared to the PMPR and L-ornithine; CI [0.41-0.63], p = 0.009, CI [1.45-2.72], p < 0.0001.
CONCLUSION: After one year, L-ornithine supplementation demonstrated more pronounced clinical benefits than L-arginine, although both can modulate gingival CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages.