PloS one · 2025
Evaluation of the effects of lumbosacral dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment applied via a caudally inserted flexible electrode in radicular pain due to lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sir E, Çelenlioğlu AE, Can E, Batur Sir GD, Güven ME
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of unilateral lumbosacral dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment administered via a caudally inserted electrode to patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain (LRP) due to foraminal stenosis.
METHODS: The study cohort included 80 patients. Patients were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and modified Oswestry disability index (MODI) at pre-, 3 weeks, and 6 months postprocedure. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups based on their lumbar surgery history: those without a lumbar surgery history (group N), those who underwent discectomy surgery (group D), and those who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery (group S). Treatment success was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in pain scores at 6 months.
RESULTS: NRS and MODI scores were significantly decreased at all follow-ups (P < 0.001). Treatment success (≥50% reduction in NRS scores) at 6-month follow-up was 53.6% in the cohort (group N, 75%; group D, 61.5%; group S, 30.8%; P = 0.004). In group N, decreased NRS and MODI scores were more significant than those with a history of surgery, with the procedure duration being shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: DRG PRF administered caudally is an effective, safe method in patients with refractory LRP due to foraminal stenosis. Specifically, it provides convenience on patients with instrumentation-related imaging difficulties or those with anatomic disorders such as lordosis, large osteophytes, and severe rotation. In addition, this treatment method can be preferred due to its advantages such as reaching multiple DRG levels with a single needle entry, applying PRF and direct drug injection to the epidural space.
METHODS: The study cohort included 80 patients. Patients were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and modified Oswestry disability index (MODI) at pre-, 3 weeks, and 6 months postprocedure. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups based on their lumbar surgery history: those without a lumbar surgery history (group N), those who underwent discectomy surgery (group D), and those who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery (group S). Treatment success was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in pain scores at 6 months.
RESULTS: NRS and MODI scores were significantly decreased at all follow-ups (P < 0.001). Treatment success (≥50% reduction in NRS scores) at 6-month follow-up was 53.6% in the cohort (group N, 75%; group D, 61.5%; group S, 30.8%; P = 0.004). In group N, decreased NRS and MODI scores were more significant than those with a history of surgery, with the procedure duration being shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: DRG PRF administered caudally is an effective, safe method in patients with refractory LRP due to foraminal stenosis. Specifically, it provides convenience on patients with instrumentation-related imaging difficulties or those with anatomic disorders such as lordosis, large osteophytes, and severe rotation. In addition, this treatment method can be preferred due to its advantages such as reaching multiple DRG levels with a single needle entry, applying PRF and direct drug injection to the epidural space.