American journal of dentistry · 2003
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of class II furcation defects. A randomized clinical trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cury Patricia R, Jeffcoat Marjorie K, Sallum Antônio W, Cafesse Raul, Nociti Júnior Francisco H, Sallum Enilson A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcomes after guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with a bioabsorbable membrane in Class II furcation defects in mandibular molars. The open flap debridement (OFD) was used as the control.
METHODS: Nine patients, with two comparable Class II furcation defects were included in the study. After initial preparation, the defects were randomly assigned in each patient to either GTR-group or OFD-group. Clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained at baseline and 6 months after the surgeries. The radiographs were analyzed by subtraction radiography.
RESULTS: Comparing baseline to 6-month results, both groups showed statistically significant probing depth reduction (PD), horizontal clinical attachment level (CAL-h) gain, and increase in gingival recession (GR). The vertical clinical attachment level (CAL-v) gain was statistically significant only for the OFD-group. Comparing the two treatments, no statistically significant differences were found in PD reduction (GTR: 1.67 mm; OFD: 2.51 mm, P = 0.26), CAL-v gain (GTR: 0.62 mm; OFD: 1.16 mm, P= 0.37), and GR increase (GTR: 1.04 mm; OFD: 1.24 mm, P = 0.31). GTR provided complete closure of the furcation defect in two sites and superior horizontal clinical attachment level gain (GTR: 2.27 mm; OFD: 1.01 mm, P = 0.05). Subtraction radiography showed significant difference in bone height change between GTR-group and OFD-group (-0.14 mm and 0.86 mm, respectively; P = 0.028) at 6 months.
METHODS: Nine patients, with two comparable Class II furcation defects were included in the study. After initial preparation, the defects were randomly assigned in each patient to either GTR-group or OFD-group. Clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained at baseline and 6 months after the surgeries. The radiographs were analyzed by subtraction radiography.
RESULTS: Comparing baseline to 6-month results, both groups showed statistically significant probing depth reduction (PD), horizontal clinical attachment level (CAL-h) gain, and increase in gingival recession (GR). The vertical clinical attachment level (CAL-v) gain was statistically significant only for the OFD-group. Comparing the two treatments, no statistically significant differences were found in PD reduction (GTR: 1.67 mm; OFD: 2.51 mm, P = 0.26), CAL-v gain (GTR: 0.62 mm; OFD: 1.16 mm, P= 0.37), and GR increase (GTR: 1.04 mm; OFD: 1.24 mm, P = 0.31). GTR provided complete closure of the furcation defect in two sites and superior horizontal clinical attachment level gain (GTR: 2.27 mm; OFD: 1.01 mm, P = 0.05). Subtraction radiography showed significant difference in bone height change between GTR-group and OFD-group (-0.14 mm and 0.86 mm, respectively; P = 0.028) at 6 months.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Absorbable ImplantsAlveolar ProcessBiocompatible MaterialsCitratesDebridementFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFurcation DefectsGingival RecessionGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalHumansMaleMembranes, ArtificialMiddle AgedPeriodontal Attachment LossPeriodontal PocketPolyestersRadiographySubtraction TechniqueTreatment Outcome