Journal of gastroenterology · 1999
Evaluation of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with and without simultaneous ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nishikawa Y, Hosokawa Y, Doi T, Endo H, Tanimizu M, Hyodo I, Jinno K, Sakata T, Tomoda J
Аннотация
For more effective and simple endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices, we developed an EIS procedure with ligation (EISL) that is non-invasive, in which EIS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) are performed simultaneously. In this study, we compared EISL and EIS in a randomized sample of patients (n = 14 for each procedure). For EISL, EVL was performed, including the injection site, after the injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate with iopamidol (EOI) into a varix. The mean number of treatment sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices was 2.3+/-0.5 for EISL and 3.9+/-0.8 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean number of treatment sites was 6.2+/-2.2 for EISL and 14.0+/-5.0 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean total amount of EOI used was 13.8+/-5.2ml for EISL and 26.3+/-9.8ml for EIS (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence of varices or in bleeding between the two groups. For EISL, fewer treatment sessions and less sclerosant were sufficient, probably because the sclerosants were more effective due to the blockage of variceal blood flow by the ligation. This method should provide a novel modification of EIS.