European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
Cross-modality PET image synthesis for Parkinson's Disease diagnosis: a leap from [18F]FDG to [11C]CFT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shen Zhenrong, Wang Jing, Huang Haolin, Lu Jiaying, Ge Jingjie, Xiong Honglin, Wu Ping, Ju Zizhao, Lin Huamei, Zhu Yuhua, Yang Yunhao, Liu Fengtao, Guan Yihui, Sun Kaicong, Wang Jian, Wang Qian, Zuo Chuantao
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Dopamine transporter [11C]CFT PET is highly effective for diagnosing Parkinson's Disease (PD), whereas it is not widely available in most hospitals. To develop a deep learning framework to synthesize [11C]CFT PET images from real [18F]FDG PET images and leverage their cross-modal correlation to distinguish PD from normal control (NC).
METHODS: We developed a deep learning framework to synthesize [11C]CFT PET images from real [18F]FDG PET images, and leveraged their cross-modal correlation to distinguish PD from NC. A total of 604 participants (274 with PD and 330 with NC) who underwent [11C]CFT and [18F]FDG PET scans were included. The quality of the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images was evaluated through quantitative comparison with the ground-truth images and radiologist visual assessment. The evaluations of PD diagnosis performance were conducted using biomarker-based quantitative analyses (using striatal binding ratios from synthetic [11C]CFT PET images) and the proposed PD classifier (incorporating both real [18F]FDG and synthetic [11C]CFT PET images).
RESULTS: Visualization result shows that the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images resemble the real ones with no significant differences visible in the error maps. Quantitative evaluation demonstrated that synthetic [11C]CFT PET images exhibited a high peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR: 25.0-28.0) and structural similarity (SSIM: 0.87-0.96) across different unilateral striatal subregions. The radiologists achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 91.9% (± 2.02%) based on synthetic [11C]CFT PET images, while biomarker-based quantitative analysis of the posterior putamen yielded an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.889-0.936), and the proposed PD Classifier achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI, 0.916-0.957).
CONCLUSION: By bridging the gap between [18F]FDG and [11C]CFT, our deep learning framework can significantly enhance PD diagnosis without the need for [11C]CFT tracers, thereby expanding the reach of advanced diagnostic tools to clinical settings where [11C]CFT PET imaging is inaccessible.
METHODS: We developed a deep learning framework to synthesize [11C]CFT PET images from real [18F]FDG PET images, and leveraged their cross-modal correlation to distinguish PD from NC. A total of 604 participants (274 with PD and 330 with NC) who underwent [11C]CFT and [18F]FDG PET scans were included. The quality of the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images was evaluated through quantitative comparison with the ground-truth images and radiologist visual assessment. The evaluations of PD diagnosis performance were conducted using biomarker-based quantitative analyses (using striatal binding ratios from synthetic [11C]CFT PET images) and the proposed PD classifier (incorporating both real [18F]FDG and synthetic [11C]CFT PET images).
RESULTS: Visualization result shows that the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images resemble the real ones with no significant differences visible in the error maps. Quantitative evaluation demonstrated that synthetic [11C]CFT PET images exhibited a high peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR: 25.0-28.0) and structural similarity (SSIM: 0.87-0.96) across different unilateral striatal subregions. The radiologists achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 91.9% (± 2.02%) based on synthetic [11C]CFT PET images, while biomarker-based quantitative analysis of the posterior putamen yielded an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.889-0.936), and the proposed PD Classifier achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI, 0.916-0.957).
CONCLUSION: By bridging the gap between [18F]FDG and [11C]CFT, our deep learning framework can significantly enhance PD diagnosis without the need for [11C]CFT tracers, thereby expanding the reach of advanced diagnostic tools to clinical settings where [11C]CFT PET imaging is inaccessible.