Nature medicine · 2025
Intracerebroventricular anaerobic dopamine in Parkinson's disease with L-dopa-related complications: a phase 1/2 randomized-controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование I фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moreau Caroline, Odou Pascal, Labreuche Julien, Demailly Alexandre, Touzet Gustavo, Reyns Nicolas, Gouges Bastien, Duhamel Alain, Barthelemy Christine, Lannoy Damien, Carta Natacha, Palas Benjamin, Vasseur Michèle, Marchand Felix, Ollivier Thomas, Leclercq Céline, Potey Camille, Ouk Thavarak, Baigne Simon, Dujardin Kathy, Carton Louise, Rolland Anne Sophie, Devedjian Jean Christophe, Foutel Véronique, Deplanque Dominique, Fisichella Matthieu, Devos David
Аннотация
Continuous compensation for cerebral dopamine deficiency represents an ideal treatment for Parkinson's disease. Dopamine does not cross the digestive and blood-brain barriers and is rapidly oxidized. The new concept is the intracerebroventricular administration of anaerobic dopamine (A-dopamine) using an abdominal pump connected to a subcutaneous catheter implanted in the third ventricle, near the striatum. An open-label phase 1 study showed no serious adverse reactions induced by A-dopamine in 12 patients. A randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover phase 2 study of 1 month of A-dopamine versus 1 month of optimized oral antiparkinsonian therapy was conducted in 9 patients. The primary endpoint, a blinded assessment of the percentage over target (that is, time with dyskinesia or bradykinesia), recorded by home actimetry using a wristwatch, was significantly reduced on A-dopamine compared with that on oral treatment alone (P = 0.027), with a median within-patient difference of -10.4 (Hedge g = -0.62 (95% confidence interval: -1.43, -0.08)). Home diaries were also significantly improved. These initial data on the feasibility, safety and effects of this new device-assisted therapy suggest validation by a large randomized double-blind trial. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04332276 .