Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022
On the Electrophysiology and Mapping of Intramural Arrhythmic Focus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Robert D, Rodriguez Padilla Jairo, Joens Christian, Masse Stephane, Bhaskaran Abhishek, Magtibay Karl, Niri Ahmed, Asta John, Lai Patrick, Azam Mohammed Ali, Vigmond Edward, Nanthakumar Kumaraswamy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conventional mapping of focal ventricular arrhythmias relies on unipolar electrogram characteristics and early local activation times. Deep intramural foci are common and associated with high recurrence rates following catheter-based radiofrequency ablation. We assessed the accuracy of unipolar morphological patterns and mapping surface indices to predict the site and depth of ventricular arrhythmogenic focal sources.
METHODS: An experimental beating-heart model used Langendorff-perfused, healthy swine hearts. A custom 56-pole electrode array catheter was positioned on the left ventricle. A plunge needle was placed perpendicular in the center of the grid to simulate arrhythmic foci at variable depths. Unipolar electrograms and local activation times were generated. Simulation models from 2 human hearts were also included with grids positioned simultaneously on the endocardium-epicardium from multiple left ventricular, septal, and outflow tract sites.
RESULTS: A unipolar Q or QS complex lacks specificity for superficial arrhythmic foci, as this morphology pattern occupies a large surface area and is the predominant pattern as intramural depth increases without developing a R component. There is progressive displacement from the arrhythmic focus to the surface exit as intramural focus depth increases. A shorter total activation time over the overlying electrode array, larger surface area within initial 20 ms activation, and a dual surface breakout pattern all indicate a deep focus.
CONCLUSIONS: Displacement from the focal intramural origin to the exit site on the mapping surface could lead to erroneous lesion delivery strategies. Traditional unipolar electrogram features lack specificity to predict the intramural arrhythmic source; however, novel endocardial-epicardial mapping surface indices can be used to determine the depth of arrhythmic foci.
METHODS: An experimental beating-heart model used Langendorff-perfused, healthy swine hearts. A custom 56-pole electrode array catheter was positioned on the left ventricle. A plunge needle was placed perpendicular in the center of the grid to simulate arrhythmic foci at variable depths. Unipolar electrograms and local activation times were generated. Simulation models from 2 human hearts were also included with grids positioned simultaneously on the endocardium-epicardium from multiple left ventricular, septal, and outflow tract sites.
RESULTS: A unipolar Q or QS complex lacks specificity for superficial arrhythmic foci, as this morphology pattern occupies a large surface area and is the predominant pattern as intramural depth increases without developing a R component. There is progressive displacement from the arrhythmic focus to the surface exit as intramural focus depth increases. A shorter total activation time over the overlying electrode array, larger surface area within initial 20 ms activation, and a dual surface breakout pattern all indicate a deep focus.
CONCLUSIONS: Displacement from the focal intramural origin to the exit site on the mapping surface could lead to erroneous lesion delivery strategies. Traditional unipolar electrogram features lack specificity to predict the intramural arrhythmic source; however, novel endocardial-epicardial mapping surface indices can be used to determine the depth of arrhythmic foci.