Journal of electrocardiology · 2022
Electrocardiographic features of paradoxical ventriculophasic response.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakashima Takashi, Nagase Masaru, Shibahara Taro, Ono Daiju, Yamada Takehiro, Tanabe Gen, Suzuki Keita, Yamaura Makoto, Ido Takahisa, Takahashi Shigekiyo, Okura Hiroyuki, Aoyama Takuma
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Paradoxical ventriculophasic response (P-VR), a rare entity, has not been fully investigated. This study sought to compare the electrocardiographic features of P-VR and typical ventriculophasic response (T-VR).
METHODS: The 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data recorded before implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device were analyzed in patients with greater than second-degree atrioventricular block (AVB). P-VR or T-VR was defined as present if the PP interval interposing a QRS complex was prolonged or shortened, respectively, by >3% compared with the preceding PP interval without a QRS complex when a QRS complex occurred within a span of 60% of the preceding PP interval.
RESULTS: Of 95 patients (age 80 ± 9 years; 49 men) with heart block, 1868 instances (an instance was defined as a set of PP intervals without a QRS complex and the subsequent PP interval interposing a QRS complex) from 214 ECGs were analyzed: 894 instances from 122 ECGs in 64 patients with complete AVB (cAVB) and 974 instances from 92 ECGs in 43 patients with 2:1 AVB (12 showed both cAVB and 2:1 AVB). P-VR was observed in 48 patients (51%). The position of the interposed QRS complex relative to the preceding PP interval was earlier in P-VR than in T-VR. The PP interval was shorter in P-VR than in T-VR.
CONCLUSION: P-VR was present in >50% of patients and was affected by the position of the interposed QRS complex and the PP interval.
METHODS: The 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data recorded before implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device were analyzed in patients with greater than second-degree atrioventricular block (AVB). P-VR or T-VR was defined as present if the PP interval interposing a QRS complex was prolonged or shortened, respectively, by >3% compared with the preceding PP interval without a QRS complex when a QRS complex occurred within a span of 60% of the preceding PP interval.
RESULTS: Of 95 patients (age 80 ± 9 years; 49 men) with heart block, 1868 instances (an instance was defined as a set of PP intervals without a QRS complex and the subsequent PP interval interposing a QRS complex) from 214 ECGs were analyzed: 894 instances from 122 ECGs in 64 patients with complete AVB (cAVB) and 974 instances from 92 ECGs in 43 patients with 2:1 AVB (12 showed both cAVB and 2:1 AVB). P-VR was observed in 48 patients (51%). The position of the interposed QRS complex relative to the preceding PP interval was earlier in P-VR than in T-VR. The PP interval was shorter in P-VR than in T-VR.
CONCLUSION: P-VR was present in >50% of patients and was affected by the position of the interposed QRS complex and the PP interval.