Heart rhythm · 2022
SCN5A mutation in Brugada syndrome is associated with substrate severity detected by electrocardiographic imaging and high-density electroanatomic mapping.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pannone Luigi, Monaco Cinzia, Sorgente Antonio, Vergara Pasquale, Gauthey Anaïs, Calburean Paul-Adrian, Bisignani Antonio, Paparella Gaetano, Ramak Robbert, Overeinder Ingrid, Bala Gezim, Almorad Alexandre, Ströker Erwin, Pappaert Gudrun, Sieira Juan, Brugada Pedro, Van Dooren Sonia, de Ravel Thomy, La Meir Mark, Chierchia Gian Battista, de Asmundis Carlo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is caused by mutations in SCN5A gene in 15%-20% of cases. Previous studies showed worse prognosis in SCN5A mutation carriers (SCN5A+). To date, there are no data on genotype-phenotype correlation with electrocardiographic (ECG) imaging (ECGI) and high-density epicardial electroanatomic map.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to correlate SCN5A mutation with substrate severity in BrS assessed by ECGI and high-density electroanatomic map.
METHODS: All consecutive BrS patients undergoing ECGI and high-density epicardial electroanatomic map with HD Grid Mapping Catheter were retrospectively analyzed. On ECGI, the following parameters were analyzed before and after ajmaline administration: right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) activation time (RVOT-AT) and RVOT recovery time (RVOT-RT). On electroanatomic map, the parameters analyzed before and after ajmaline were high-frequency potential activation time (HFPat), high-frequency potential duration (HFPd), high-frequency potential amplitude (HFPa), low-frequency potential activation time (LFPat), low-frequency potential duration (LFPd), and low-frequency potential amplitude (LFPa).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine BrS patients with ECGI were included. Eight patients (20.5%) were SCN5A+. At baseline ECGI map, mean RVOT-RT was longer in SCN5A+ (P = .024). After ajmaline administration, SCN5A+ patients showed longer RVOT-AT (125.6 vs 100.8 ms; P = .045) and longer RVOT-RT (426.4 vs 397 ms; P = .033). After ajmaline administration, SCN5A+ showed longer HFPat (164.1 vs 119.5 ms; P = .041); longer LFPat (272.7 vs 200.5 ms; P = .018); and longer LFPd (211.9 vs 151.2 ms; P = .033).
CONCLUSION: In BrS, SCN5A+ patients compared with SCN5A- patients exhibit marked depolarization and repolarization abnormalities as assessed by ECGI and epicardial high-density electroanatomic map.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to correlate SCN5A mutation with substrate severity in BrS assessed by ECGI and high-density electroanatomic map.
METHODS: All consecutive BrS patients undergoing ECGI and high-density epicardial electroanatomic map with HD Grid Mapping Catheter were retrospectively analyzed. On ECGI, the following parameters were analyzed before and after ajmaline administration: right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) activation time (RVOT-AT) and RVOT recovery time (RVOT-RT). On electroanatomic map, the parameters analyzed before and after ajmaline were high-frequency potential activation time (HFPat), high-frequency potential duration (HFPd), high-frequency potential amplitude (HFPa), low-frequency potential activation time (LFPat), low-frequency potential duration (LFPd), and low-frequency potential amplitude (LFPa).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine BrS patients with ECGI were included. Eight patients (20.5%) were SCN5A+. At baseline ECGI map, mean RVOT-RT was longer in SCN5A+ (P = .024). After ajmaline administration, SCN5A+ patients showed longer RVOT-AT (125.6 vs 100.8 ms; P = .045) and longer RVOT-RT (426.4 vs 397 ms; P = .033). After ajmaline administration, SCN5A+ showed longer HFPat (164.1 vs 119.5 ms; P = .041); longer LFPat (272.7 vs 200.5 ms; P = .018); and longer LFPd (211.9 vs 151.2 ms; P = .033).
CONCLUSION: In BrS, SCN5A+ patients compared with SCN5A- patients exhibit marked depolarization and repolarization abnormalities as assessed by ECGI and epicardial high-density electroanatomic map.