European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology · 2004
Quantitative analysis of intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography during percutaneous septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hering Detlef, Welge Dirk, Fassbender Dieter, Horstkotte Dieter, Faber Lothar
Аннотация
AIMS: We tested whether procedural success of percutaneous septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is related to quantitative measurements of intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In a study group of 34 patients, the mean area of the contrast depot was 8.5+/-2.5 cm2, its length along the left ventricular endocardial border 3.0+/-0.7 cm and its proximal edge 2.0+/-0.6 cm upstream the point of mitral-septal contact. Clinical and hemodynamic success was achieved in all but one patient 3 months following percutaneous septal ablation. The proximal edge of the ablation lesion correlated weakly (r=0.5) with the proximal edge of the contrast depot with respect to their distance from the mitral valve leaflet tips. No other correlations were found between the efficacy of percutaneous septal ablation and various quantitative measurements of intraprocedural contrast echocardiography.
CONCLUSIONS: The localization of the ablation lesion 3 months after percutaneous septal ablation is predicted by the localization of the contrast depot with respect to the point of mitral-septal contact. The final hemodynamic effect of the ablation lesion, however, does not correlate with quantitative parameters of intraprocedural contrast echocardiography, but appears to be the result of an individual remodeling process.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In a study group of 34 patients, the mean area of the contrast depot was 8.5+/-2.5 cm2, its length along the left ventricular endocardial border 3.0+/-0.7 cm and its proximal edge 2.0+/-0.6 cm upstream the point of mitral-septal contact. Clinical and hemodynamic success was achieved in all but one patient 3 months following percutaneous septal ablation. The proximal edge of the ablation lesion correlated weakly (r=0.5) with the proximal edge of the contrast depot with respect to their distance from the mitral valve leaflet tips. No other correlations were found between the efficacy of percutaneous septal ablation and various quantitative measurements of intraprocedural contrast echocardiography.
CONCLUSIONS: The localization of the ablation lesion 3 months after percutaneous septal ablation is predicted by the localization of the contrast depot with respect to the point of mitral-septal contact. The final hemodynamic effect of the ablation lesion, however, does not correlate with quantitative parameters of intraprocedural contrast echocardiography, but appears to be the result of an individual remodeling process.