Characteristics and Possible Mechanisms of Direction-Reversing Nystagmus During Positional Testing in Patients With Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

OBJECTIVES

The occurrence of direction-reversing nystagmus during positional testing in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is not uncommon. Further in-depth analysis of the characteristics and possible mechanisms of direction-reversing nystagmus will help us to diagnose and treat BPPV more precisely. The study aimed to analyze the incidence and characteristics of direction-reversing nystagmus during positional testing in BPPV patients, evaluate the outcomes of canalith repositioning procedure for these patients, and further explore the possible mechanism of reversal nystagmus in BPPV patients.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Single-center study.

PATIENTS: A total of 575 patients with BPPV who visited the Vertigo Clinic of our hospital between April 2017 and June 2021 were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dix-Hallpike and supine roll tests were performed. The nystagmus was recorded using videonystagmography. The characteristics of direction-reversing nystagmus and the possible underlying mechanism were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with BPPV who showed reversal nystagmus accounted for 9.39% (54 of 575) of all BPPV patients visiting our hospital during the same period, of which 5.57% (32 of 575) had horizontal semicircular canal BPPV (HC-BPPV), and 3.83% (22 of 575) had posterior semicircular canal BPPV (PC-BPPV). The maximum slow-phase velocities (mSPVs) of the first-phase nystagmus were greater in HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV patients with reversal nystagmus than those without ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). In all HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV patients with reversal nystagmus, the mSPV of the first-phase nystagmus was greater than that of the second-phase nystagmus ( p < 0.01). The duration of the second-phase nystagmus was longer than 60 seconds in 93.75% (30 of 32) of the HC-BPPV patients and 77.27% (17 of 22) of the PC-BPPV patients ( p = 0.107, Fisher exact test). HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV patients with reversal nystagmus both required more than one canalith repositioning procedure compared with those without (HC-BPPV: 75 versus 28.13%, p < 0.001; PC-BPPV: 59.09 versus 13.64%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of second-phase nystagmus in BPPV patients with direction-reversing nystagmus may be related to the involvement of central adaptation mechanisms secondary to the overpowering mSPV of the first-phase nystagmus.