The British journal of radiology · 2017
Gating window dependency on scanned carbon-ion beam dose distribution and imaging dose for thoracoabdominal treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mori Shinichiro, Karube Masataka, Yasuda Shigeo, Yamamoto Naoyoshi, Tsuji Hiroshi, Kamada Tadashi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the trade-off between dose assessment and imaging dose in respiratory gating with radiographic fluoroscopic imaging, we evaluated the relationship between dose assessment and fluoroscopic imaging dose in various gating windows, retrospectively.
METHODS: Four-dimensional (4D) CT images acquired for 10 patients with lung and liver tumours were used for 4D treatment planning for scanned carbon ion beam. Imaging dose from two oblique directions was calculated by the number of images multiplied by the air kerma per image. Necessary beam-on time was calculated from the treatment log file. Accumulated dose distribution was calculated. The gating window was defined as tumour position not respiratory phase and changed from 0-100% duty cycle on 4DCT. These metrics were individually evaluated for every case.
RESULTS: For lung cases, sufficient dose conformation was achieved in respective gating windows [D95-clinical target volume (CTV) > 99%]. V20-lung values for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles were 2.5% and 6.0% of that for 100%-duty cycle. Maximum doses (cord/oesophagus) for 30%-duty cycle decreased 6.8%/7.4% to those for 100%-duty cycle. For liver cases, V10-liver values for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles were 9.4% and 12.8% of those for 100%-duty cycle, respectively. Maximum doses (cord/oesophagus) for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles also decreased 17.2%/19.3% and 24.6%/29.8% to those for 100%-duty cycle, respectively. Total imaging doses increased 43.5% and 115.8% for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles to that for the 100%-duty cycle.
CONCLUSION: When normal tissue doses are below the tolerance level, the gating window should be expanded to minimize imaging dose and treatment time. Advances in knowledge: The skin dose from imaging might not be counterbalanced to the OAR dose; however, imaging dose is a particularly important factor.
METHODS: Four-dimensional (4D) CT images acquired for 10 patients with lung and liver tumours were used for 4D treatment planning for scanned carbon ion beam. Imaging dose from two oblique directions was calculated by the number of images multiplied by the air kerma per image. Necessary beam-on time was calculated from the treatment log file. Accumulated dose distribution was calculated. The gating window was defined as tumour position not respiratory phase and changed from 0-100% duty cycle on 4DCT. These metrics were individually evaluated for every case.
RESULTS: For lung cases, sufficient dose conformation was achieved in respective gating windows [D95-clinical target volume (CTV) > 99%]. V20-lung values for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles were 2.5% and 6.0% of that for 100%-duty cycle. Maximum doses (cord/oesophagus) for 30%-duty cycle decreased 6.8%/7.4% to those for 100%-duty cycle. For liver cases, V10-liver values for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles were 9.4% and 12.8% of those for 100%-duty cycle, respectively. Maximum doses (cord/oesophagus) for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles also decreased 17.2%/19.3% and 24.6%/29.8% to those for 100%-duty cycle, respectively. Total imaging doses increased 43.5% and 115.8% for 50%- and 30%-duty cycles to that for the 100%-duty cycle.
CONCLUSION: When normal tissue doses are below the tolerance level, the gating window should be expanded to minimize imaging dose and treatment time. Advances in knowledge: The skin dose from imaging might not be counterbalanced to the OAR dose; however, imaging dose is a particularly important factor.