Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
Development and validation of an interpretable CT-based scoring model for gastric cancer aggressiveness.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Ying-Qiao, Zhang Juan, Jin Yu-Yao, Li Dan, Zhao Wen-Juan, Guo Peng-Yu, Tian Zhen-Nan, Jiang Yang, Zhao Min, Liu Si-Yun, Wang Zi-Qi, Zhu Xin-Yu, Ma Zhen-Qi, Sui Lin, Liang Yan-Meng, Han Geng, Ye Zhao-Xiang, Zhang Xiu-Shi, Liu Yang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Accurate prediction of adverse histopathological status (AHS) in gastric cancer (GC) is clinically crucial due to its strong association with poor prognosis. This study aims to develop and validate a CT-based machine learning model for AHS prediction, and establish an interpretable imaging score (I-score) for prognostic stratification.
METHODS: In this dual-center retrospective study, 1164 GC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy between 2014 and 2023 were included. Four semantic CT features, including clinical lymph node status (cN), longest diameter (LD), tumor thickness (TT), and serosal status, were independently evaluated by radiologists. Radiomic features were extracted from arterial and portal venous phase volumes of interest. Logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained to predict AHS. The best-performing model was used to construct the I-score, which was validated in an independent cohort for prognostic assessment.
RESULTS: Among the 1164 patients (median age: 62 years old; 847 men, 317 women), data were divided into training (n = 396), test (n = 618), and validation (n = 150) cohorts. The XGBoost model using semantic features achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC: 0.803, 0.848 and 0.764, respectively). The derived I-score stratified patients into low-risk (43%) and high-risk (57%) groups, with significantly poorer 1000-day overall survival in the high-risk group (55.7% vs. 73.8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed the I-score as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.02, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The simplified CT-based machine learning model using semantic imaging features achieved high predictive performance for AHS in GC. The interpretable I-score enables effective preoperative risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.
METHODS: In this dual-center retrospective study, 1164 GC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy between 2014 and 2023 were included. Four semantic CT features, including clinical lymph node status (cN), longest diameter (LD), tumor thickness (TT), and serosal status, were independently evaluated by radiologists. Radiomic features were extracted from arterial and portal venous phase volumes of interest. Logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained to predict AHS. The best-performing model was used to construct the I-score, which was validated in an independent cohort for prognostic assessment.
RESULTS: Among the 1164 patients (median age: 62 years old; 847 men, 317 women), data were divided into training (n = 396), test (n = 618), and validation (n = 150) cohorts. The XGBoost model using semantic features achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC: 0.803, 0.848 and 0.764, respectively). The derived I-score stratified patients into low-risk (43%) and high-risk (57%) groups, with significantly poorer 1000-day overall survival in the high-risk group (55.7% vs. 73.8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed the I-score as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.02, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The simplified CT-based machine learning model using semantic imaging features achieved high predictive performance for AHS in GC. The interpretable I-score enables effective preoperative risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.