MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006995

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgery · 2026

Elucidating the Optimal Use of Mitigation Strategies for Improving Pancreatic Fistula Rates after Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Judish Max M, Vollmer Charles M, Pancreas Fistula Study Group

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify optimal approaches to fistula mitigation for pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) is the most consequential complication following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). To date, the various POPF prevention methods have been investigated predominantly in isolation; however, the complexity of PD demands studying the interplay between approaches.

METHODS

7128 PDs with complete POPF, Fistula Risk Score (FRS), and mitigation data were performed from 2000-2024 between 18 international institutions. Techniques analyzed were: drains, stents, octreotide, pancreatogastrostomy, and sealants. POPF was tabulated for strategy combinations, accounting for FRS. The additive effect of early drain removal (EDR; POD≤4) was assessed.

RESULTS

The fistula rate was 15.1%. Mitigation application rates were drains=94.0%; stents=37.4%; octreotide=21.2%; pancreatogastrostomy=3.5%; and sealants=3.3%. Analyzed individually, drains were not associated with POPF, while stents, octreotide, pancreatogastrostomy, and sealants were associated with increased POPF. Risk adjustment revealed nuance among the 27 observed mitigation combinations. For Negligible and Low FRS patients, no approach improved upon omission. Drain-alone was best for Moderate FRS patients (POPF: 13.1% vs. 19.8%, P <0.001). Best outcomes for High FRS patients were achieved by employing Drain+Stent (23.7% vs. 38.5%, P <0.001). These results inform a "playbook" of optimal management. Increased adherence to these tenets was associated with improved surgeon practice-level fistula rates ( P =0.034). Universal adoption of optimal fistula mitigation projects to eliminate from one-third of fistulas, up to one-half when incorporating EDR.

CONCLUSION

This robust experience indicates that many frequently employed fistula mitigation tactics are actually ineffective. Conversely, the optimal approaches identified herein are underutilized-in just 32% of patients. Simplified, tailored application can drive down stubborn fistula rates, enhance care, and move toward personalized medicine for fistula prevention.

Для цитирования: Judish Max M, Vollmer Charles M, Pancreas Fistula Study Group. Elucidating the Optimal Use of Mitigation Strategies for Improving Pancreatic Fistula Rates after Pancreatoduodenectomy.. Annals of surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006995.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.