MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102664

Медицинская библиотека · Current problems in cardiology · 2024

Pharmacovigilance study for SGLT 2 inhibitors- Safety review of real-world data & randomized clinical trials.

Bhanushali Karan B, Asnani Heena K, Nair Ambica, Ganatra Sarju, Dani Sourbha S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Despite effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT 2) inhibitors, concerns have been raised about the potential side effects of these drugs. Thus, a pharmaco-vigilance study was designed that aims to identify any discrepancies between the reported adverse events & assess the safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

We studied diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), euglycemic DKA, amputation, urinary tract infection (UTI), mycotic genital infection & hypotension associated with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin & ertugliflozin in RCTs and reporting databases. WHO's VigiBase, FAERS, EMA's EudraVigilance & DAEN were thoroughly studied to obtain spontaneously reported real-world adverse events.

RESULTS

Different SGLT2 inhibitors exhibit varied side effect profiles. Additionally, the findings suggest that adverse events may be more likely to occur in a broader population in the real world than in a highly inclusive clinical trial subset

CONCLUSION

Our study provides comparison of the real world reported adverse events to adverse events reported in the clinical trials studying the efficacy of SGLT 2 inhibitors.

Для цитирования: Bhanushali Karan B, Asnani Heena K, Nair Ambica, Ganatra Sarju, Dani Sourbha S. Pharmacovigilance study for SGLT 2 inhibitors- Safety review of real-world data & randomized clinical trials.. Current problems in cardiology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102664.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.