Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Comprehensive Survey of Recognition, Training, and Practice.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
González-Pérez Leonor Victoria, Saldivia-Siracusa Cristina, Ribeiro E Silva Ana Carolina Prado, Aristizábal Arboleda Lady Paola, Domínguez Gallagher Karen Patricia, Araújo Anna Luiza Damaceno, Vargas Pablo Agustin, Paparella María Luisa, Ortega Pinto Ana Verónica, González-Arriagada Wilfredo Alejandro, Peña-Vega Claudia Patricia, Gerber-Mora Roberto, García Heredia Gilda Lucia, Cuadra Zelaya Florence Juana Maria, Hurtado Castillo Ileana Del Rosario, Rajendra Santosh Arvind Babu, Mosqueda-Taylor Adalberto, Castillo Gurdián Erick Antonio, González Galván María Del Carmen, Delgado Azañero Wilson, Rivera Helen, Bologna-Molina Ronell, Villarroel-Dorrego Mariana, Flores Ramos Janeth Liliam, Gaidos Nates Carlos Alberto, Reiván Ortiz Patricia, Arambu Turcios Claudette, Martínez Cruz Erick, Ken Loyden Evan, Hunter Keith D, Santos-Silva Alan Roger
Аннотация
METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted, where senior professionals in OMFP from 21 LAC countries were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire via the REDCap web platform.
RESULTS: Experts from 21 countries reported recognition of OMFP as a dental specialty in 76.2% of the countries, with 61.9% offering it as an independent program distinct from oral medicine. Specific regulations for practice were present in 52.4% of the countries, and 33.3% offered postgraduate programs, mainly combining other specialties. The professional activities of participants were diverse, including roles in private practice, universities, research, laboratories, and hospitals. However, 61.9% of participants identified the lack of recognition for multidisciplinary teams as a significant barrier to their practice.
CONCLUSION: This groundbreaking study provides an overview of key aspects of training, practice, and recognition of OMFP in 21 LAC countries. The findings demonstrate significant variation both within the region and when compared to global studies, providing a crucial foundation for future research in this area.