MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000003368

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025

Can generative AI-enabled ChatGPT or large language models (LLMs) assist orthopedic surgeons?

Chakraborty Chiranjib, Chatterjee Srijan, Bhattacharya Manojit, Islam Md Aminul

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The incorporation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, like ChatGPT, into orthopedic surgery, has generated considerable interest among medical professionals. This paper provides an overview of the latest research on using ChatGPT in orthopedics. It explores the potential applications, advantages, obstacles, and ethical concerns of implementing this technology. Based on various studies, this paper delves into how ChatGPT contributes to patient communication, treatment planning, surgical outcomes, and diagnostic processes in orthopedic care. Although there is great potential for the technology to transform orthopedic practice, there are ongoing concerns about data security, ethical considerations, and the reliability of self-diagnosis tools. Effective collaboration among stakeholders, thorough validation procedures, and continuous research efforts are crucial in unlocking the complete potential of AI in orthopedic surgery while minimizing any risks involved. Despite the obstacles, the growing use of ChatGPT and other AI technologies in orthopedics indicates a significant change in healthcare delivery.

Для цитирования: Chakraborty Chiranjib, Chatterjee Srijan, Bhattacharya Manojit, Islam Md Aminul. Can generative AI-enabled ChatGPT or large language models (LLMs) assist orthopedic surgeons?. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000003368.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.