MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Lakartidningen · 2014

[Intracranial pressure targeted treatment in acute bacterial meningitis increased survival].

Glimåker Martin, Johansson Bibi, Halldorsdottir Halla, Wanecek Michael, Elmi-Terander Adrian, Bellander Bo-Michael

Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To evaluate the efficacy of intracranial pressure (ICP)-targeted treatment, compared to standard intensive care, in adults with community acquired acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) and severely impaired consciousness, a prospectively designed intervention-control comparison study was performed. Included were patients with confirmed ABM and severely impaired mental status on admission. Fifty-two patients, given ICP-targeted treatment at a neuro-intensive care unit, and 53 control cases, treated with conventional intensive care, were included. All patients received intensive care with me-chanical ventilation, sedation, antibiotics and corticosteroids according to current guidelines. ICP-targeted treatment was performed in the intervention group, aiming at ICP 50 mmHg. The mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to controls, 5/52 (10%) versus 16/53 (30%). Furthermore, only 17 patients (32%) in the control group fully recovered, compared to 28 (54%) in the intervention group. Early neuro-intensive care using ICP-targeted therapy reduces mortality and improves the overall outcome in adult patients with ABM and severely impaired mental status on admission.

Для цитирования: Glimåker Martin, Johansson Bibi, Halldorsdottir Halla, Wanecek Michael, Elmi-Terander Adrian, Bellander Bo-Michael. [Intracranial pressure targeted treatment in acute bacterial meningitis increased survival].. Lakartidningen. 2014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.