MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000001710

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2022

Use and safety of aprotinin in routine clinical practice: A European postauthorisation safety study conducted in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

De Hert Stefan, Ouattara Alexandre, Royston David, van der Linden Jan, Zacharowski Kai

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin has been used to reduce blood loss and blood product transfusions in patients at high risk of major blood loss during cardiac surgery. Approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for its current indication is limited to patients at high risk of major blood loss undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (iCABG).

OBJECTIVE

To report current real-world data on the use and certain endpoints related to the safety of aprotinin in adult patients.

DESIGN

The Nordic aprotinin patient registry (NAPaR) received data from 83 European centres in a noninterventional, postauthorisation safety study (PASS) performed at the request of the EMA.

SETTING

Cardiac surgical centres committed to enrolling patients in the NAPaR.

PATIENTS: Patients receiving aprotinin agreeing to participate.

INTERVENTION: The decision to administer aprotinin was made by the treating physicians.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aprotinin safety endpoints were in-hospital death, thrombo-embolic events (TEEs), specifically stroke, renal impairment, re-exploration for bleeding/tamponade.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2020, 5309 patients (male 71.5%; >75 years 18.9%) were treated with aprotinin; 1363 (25.7%) underwent iCABG and 3946 (74.3%) another procedure, including a surgical treatment for aortic dissection ( n  = 660, 16.7%); 54.5% of patients received the full-dose regimen. In-hospital mortality in iCABG patients was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.84%) vs. 8.3% (7.21 to 8.91%) in non-iCABG patients; incidence of TEEs and postoperative rise in creatinine level greater than 44 μmol l -1 2.3% (1.48 to 3.07%) and 2.7% (1.79 to 3.49%) vs. 7.2% (6.20 to 7.79%) and 15.5% (13.84 to 16.06%); patients undergoing re-exploration for bleeding 1.4% (0.71 to 1.93%) vs. 3.0% (2.39 to 3.44%). Twelve cases of hypersensitivity/anaphylactic reaction (0.2%) were reported as Adverse Drug Reactions.

CONCLUSION

The data in the NApaR indicated that in this patient population, at high risk of death or blood loss undergoing cardiac surgery, including complex cardiac surgeries other than iCABG, the incidence of adverse events is in line with data from current literature, where aprotinin was not used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU PAS register number: EUPAS11384.

Для цитирования: De Hert Stefan, Ouattara Alexandre, Royston David, van der Linden Jan, Zacharowski Kai. Use and safety of aprotinin in routine clinical practice: A European postauthorisation safety study conducted in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001710.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.