Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2014
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment in the stent graft era.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tulga Ulus A, Fahrettin Kucukay, Erdal Simsek, Sarper Oktem, Serkan Mola, Mustafa Ozdemir, Ahmet Saritas, Kerem Vural, Levent Birincioglu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aim to decrease mortality and morbidity by early diagnosis and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or by using open surgery.
METHODS: The patients who had underwent open surgery and EVAR with a diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with EVAR were separated as group I and the patients with surgical operations constituted group II. The risk factors, duration of the operation, blood product usage, drainage amounts, complications, mortality, and morbidity rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: The duration of the operation and the required blood and blood products were lower in group I (P < .05). There is no any significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality, complications, short-, and long-term results.
CONCLUSION: We support the idea that better results can be obtained by showing regard to suitable patient, suitable clinical condition, and suitable anatomy together with the correct choice of operation type.
METHODS: The patients who had underwent open surgery and EVAR with a diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with EVAR were separated as group I and the patients with surgical operations constituted group II. The risk factors, duration of the operation, blood product usage, drainage amounts, complications, mortality, and morbidity rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: The duration of the operation and the required blood and blood products were lower in group I (P < .05). There is no any significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality, complications, short-, and long-term results.
CONCLUSION: We support the idea that better results can be obtained by showing regard to suitable patient, suitable clinical condition, and suitable anatomy together with the correct choice of operation type.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome