Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022
Sex Differences in Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Popliteal Lesions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Özdemir-van Brunschot Denise M D, Torsello Giovanni B, Litterscheid Sarah, Berchiolli Raffaella, Troisi Nicola, Torsello Giovanni Federico
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Sex-based differences in peripheral arterial disease are well-known. Aim of this study was to evaluate sex-related disparities in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal artery lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1th January 2004 and 1th January 2021 304 patients underwent endovascular treatment of an isolated popliteal artery lesion at three vascular centers. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the outcomes in female versus male patients.
RESULTS: The majority of the patients were female (51.3%). Male patients were younger (70.4 vs. 76.8 years, p < 0.01). Hyperlipidemia (62.2% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.01) and diabetes (62% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) were more common in male group. There were more current and former smokers in the male group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). There were no differences regarding lesion length (mean 94.5 mm) nor location of the lesion. Technical success was comparable in both groups 94.6% vs. 97.4%), no differences in terms of in-hospital complications (9.5% vs. 7.7%) were found. At 3 years estimates did not demonstrate any difference in terms of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (23% vs. 34%), secondary patency (86% vs. 96%), and all-cause mortality (77% vs. 67%) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In our experience the female sex showed clinical signs of popliteal artery lesion at higher age with less aggressive atherosclerotic risk factors. However, during the follow-up no sex-related significant differences were found in terms of morphological and clinical outcomes after endovascular revascularization.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1th January 2004 and 1th January 2021 304 patients underwent endovascular treatment of an isolated popliteal artery lesion at three vascular centers. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the outcomes in female versus male patients.
RESULTS: The majority of the patients were female (51.3%). Male patients were younger (70.4 vs. 76.8 years, p < 0.01). Hyperlipidemia (62.2% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.01) and diabetes (62% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) were more common in male group. There were more current and former smokers in the male group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). There were no differences regarding lesion length (mean 94.5 mm) nor location of the lesion. Technical success was comparable in both groups 94.6% vs. 97.4%), no differences in terms of in-hospital complications (9.5% vs. 7.7%) were found. At 3 years estimates did not demonstrate any difference in terms of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (23% vs. 34%), secondary patency (86% vs. 96%), and all-cause mortality (77% vs. 67%) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In our experience the female sex showed clinical signs of popliteal artery lesion at higher age with less aggressive atherosclerotic risk factors. However, during the follow-up no sex-related significant differences were found in terms of morphological and clinical outcomes after endovascular revascularization.