MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2019.1687986

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2019

Management of temporomandibular disorders with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: A systematic review.

Fertout Aurélie, Manière-Ezvan Armelle, Lupi Laurence, Ehrmann Elodie

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the management of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and to determine the indications and most appropriate application modalities.

Methods

Papers published in the Medline database, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library before November 2018 were included.

Results

Fourteen articles were retained, corresponding to a total of 532 patients, among which, 285 had a TMD. Immediately after a TENS session, significant relief of pain (19.2% to 77%), significant functional improvement (mouth opening amplitude increased by between 8.7% and 19.46%), and reduced electromyographic activity of the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles were observed. However, studies comparing TENS to other physical medicine modalities (ultrasound and laser) reported equivalent results.

Conclusion

Further randomized comparative clinical trials will be necessary to optimize the use of TENS (program, duration of sessions, duration of treatment) for different types of TMD.

Для цитирования: Fertout Aurélie, Manière-Ezvan Armelle, Lupi Laurence, Ehrmann Elodie. Management of temporomandibular disorders with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: A systematic review.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1687986.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.