European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2004
Popliteal artery entrapment associated with cannabis arteritis.
Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ducasse E, Chevalier J, Dasnoy D, Speziale F, Fiorani P, Puppinck P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To report popliteal artery entrapment in a patient with distal necrosis and cannabis-related arteritis, two rare or exceptional disorders never described in association. To conduct a targeted review and especially to seek information on the clinical presentation with characteristics specific to each disorder so as to hasten the diagnosis and choose appropriate management.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 19-year-old man who presented with plantar claudication associated with necrosis in a toe underwent diagnostic arteriography and surgery for popliteal artery entrapment type III.
RESULTS: Surgical clearance resolved the popliteal artery entrapment but left the clinical symptoms unchanged. Closer questioning disclosed a history of cannabis consumption and intravenous vasodilatory therapy was started. After the 21-day course of vasodilator agents the pain disappeared and the toe necrosis regressed. The patient stopped taking cannabis and had no signs of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Whereas a popliteal artery entrapment, albeit a rare event, is well described and responds to standardized treatment, popliteal artery entrapment associated with cannabis-induced arteritis is an exceptional event that could confuse management. Because young people-the age group mainly at risk for popliteal artery entrapment-increasingly use cannabis, cannabis arteritis could become a more frequent event associated with other arterial disorders that may confuse the diagnosis and complicate management. Our experience in a young patient suggests that coexisting popliteal artery entrapment and distal necrosis in a young patient should raise a strong suspicion of an associated vascular disorder possibly related to cannabis consumption. Intravenous vasodilatation treatment is successful provided that cannabis use is discontinued.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 19-year-old man who presented with plantar claudication associated with necrosis in a toe underwent diagnostic arteriography and surgery for popliteal artery entrapment type III.
RESULTS: Surgical clearance resolved the popliteal artery entrapment but left the clinical symptoms unchanged. Closer questioning disclosed a history of cannabis consumption and intravenous vasodilatory therapy was started. After the 21-day course of vasodilator agents the pain disappeared and the toe necrosis regressed. The patient stopped taking cannabis and had no signs of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Whereas a popliteal artery entrapment, albeit a rare event, is well described and responds to standardized treatment, popliteal artery entrapment associated with cannabis-induced arteritis is an exceptional event that could confuse management. Because young people-the age group mainly at risk for popliteal artery entrapment-increasingly use cannabis, cannabis arteritis could become a more frequent event associated with other arterial disorders that may confuse the diagnosis and complicate management. Our experience in a young patient suggests that coexisting popliteal artery entrapment and distal necrosis in a young patient should raise a strong suspicion of an associated vascular disorder possibly related to cannabis consumption. Intravenous vasodilatation treatment is successful provided that cannabis use is discontinued.