Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2005
Effect of amplifier gain setting on distal motor latency in normal subjects and CTS patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goldfarb Adina R, Saadeh Peter B, Sander Howard W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine normative cutoffs and sensitivities for median distal latency (MDL), median-thenar to ulnar-thenar latency difference (TTLD), and median-thenar to ulnar-hypothenar latency difference (THLD) at various amplifier gains for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) electrodiagnosis. A prior study utilized only an amplifier gain of 0.2 mV/division.
METHODS: Abnormal cutoffs for MDL, TTLD and THLD were determined based on 34 control hands at gains of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mV. Diagnostic sensitivities were determined for 50 patients (80 hands) with clinically and electrodiagnostically defined CTS.
RESULTS: At a gain of 0.2 and 0.5 mV/division, abnormal cutoffs for MDL, THLD, and TTLD were: 3.7, 1.2, and 0.8 ms. At gains of 1, 2, and 5 mV the abnormal cutoffs were 4, 1.2, and 1 ms. The sensitivities at gains of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mV for MDL, THLD, and TTLD were: 65, 66, 53, 57, 61/86, 83, 88, 86, 86/91, 91, 76, 73, 59.
CONCLUSIONS: MDL and THLD sensitivities are gain-independent. THLD is substantially more sensitive than MDL at all gains. TTLD sensitivity is maximized with 0.2 and 0.5 mV gains.
SIGNIFICANCE: TTLD and THLD increase diagnostic sensitivity with minimal additional effort. TTLD sensitivity is maximized with 0.2 or 0.5 mV gains. The electromyographer's preferred gain may be used.
METHODS: Abnormal cutoffs for MDL, TTLD and THLD were determined based on 34 control hands at gains of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mV. Diagnostic sensitivities were determined for 50 patients (80 hands) with clinically and electrodiagnostically defined CTS.
RESULTS: At a gain of 0.2 and 0.5 mV/division, abnormal cutoffs for MDL, THLD, and TTLD were: 3.7, 1.2, and 0.8 ms. At gains of 1, 2, and 5 mV the abnormal cutoffs were 4, 1.2, and 1 ms. The sensitivities at gains of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mV for MDL, THLD, and TTLD were: 65, 66, 53, 57, 61/86, 83, 88, 86, 86/91, 91, 76, 73, 59.
CONCLUSIONS: MDL and THLD sensitivities are gain-independent. THLD is substantially more sensitive than MDL at all gains. TTLD sensitivity is maximized with 0.2 and 0.5 mV gains.
SIGNIFICANCE: TTLD and THLD increase diagnostic sensitivity with minimal additional effort. TTLD sensitivity is maximized with 0.2 or 0.5 mV gains. The electromyographer's preferred gain may be used.