MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.

Kang Do-Yoon, Ahn Jung-Min, Yun Sung-Cheol, Hur Seung-Ho, Cho Yun-Kyeong, Lee Cheol Hyun, Hong Soon Jun, Lim Subin, Kim Sang-Wook, Won Hoyoun, Oh Jun-Hyok, Choe Jeong Cheon, Hong Young Joon, Yoon Yong-Hoon, Kim Hoyun, Choi Yeonwoo, Lee Jinho, Yoon Young Won, Kim Soo-Joong, Bae Jang-Ho, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo, OCTIVUS Investigators

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions.

METHODS

This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).

Для цитирования: Kang Do-Yoon, Ahn Jung-Min, Yun Sung-Cheol, Hur Seung-Ho, Cho Yun-Kyeong, Lee Cheol Hyun, Hong Soon Jun, Lim Subin, Kim Sang-Wook, Won Hoyoun, Oh Jun-Hyok, Choe Jeong Cheon, Hong Young Joon, Yoon Yong-Hoon, Kim Hoyun, Choi Yeonwoo, Lee Jinho, Yoon Young Won, Kim Soo-Joong, Bae Jang-Ho, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo, OCTIVUS Investigators. Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.